Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Response:. <br />The proposed amendment is expanding, through in-fill development, existing strip commercial <br />property onto contiguous property. In addition to the property contained within this application <br />the applicant owns Tax Lots 501, 601 and 800 of Assessor's Map 17-04-11-44 that includes two <br />commercial designated properties that are developed at tlus time (Development Site). <br /> <br />The "Existing General Land Use Patterns" map of the River Roadl Santa Clara Urban Facilities <br />Plan is reproduced as Exhibit E.4. The map shows several areas where commercial land is <br />concentrated as "strips" along River Road. One of the areas of strip commercial development <br />begins south of Beltline Highway at Corliss Lane and proceeds north ending at Federal Lane <br />(north of the River Road! Hunsaker Lane intersection). The intent of RR/SC, Commercial and <br />Industrial Land Use Policy 3.0 is to prohibit the linear expansion of the existing strip commercial <br />areas along the fringes of existing development (as defined within suggested action 3.1). The <br />fringes of the strip commercial area are defined by the northern and southern boundaries (Federal <br />Lane and Corliss Lane respectively). The subject property is therefore within an existing strip <br />commercial area, and is not on the fringe; therefore Policy 3.0 does not prohibit cOlmnercial <br />expansion on the development site. In fact, Policy 3.0, specifically allows for existing strip <br />commercial to "expand by infilling, redevelopment or expansion onto contiguous property that <br />does not front on River Road." <br /> <br />Furthermore, the proposed text amendments provide for substantial buffering and review of <br />future development on the site in order to assure compatibility with surrounding development. <br />Pedestrian amenities, buffering and size and scale reductions to. allowed standards will mitigate <br />negative effects of commercial development upon River Road or surrounding properties. <br />Additionally, the proposed development will not front River Road, rather it will have an internal <br />circulation system with pedestrian oriented streets and public amenities (see Exhibit 1.1 <br />"Proposed Text Amendments" and Exhibit 1.2, "Site Concept" and for more information). <br /> <br />Per EC 9.2681(2) when public land is sold thr private development, the property shall be rezoned <br />according to City procedures. When the Santa Clara Elementary School was in operation the <br />Refinement Plan and Metro Plan designations were appropriate (Government and Education and <br />Low Density Residential respectively). This change of circumstance has occurred since the <br />adoption of the RRlSC and was not forecasted by the '\Titers of the plan. The applicant's intent <br />of establislling a commercial use on an in-fill development site that was fornlerly designated <br />Govermnent and Education is appropriate for an area that is already characterized as strip <br />commercial. <br /> <br />The Govenunent and Education designation retlects the commitment for the land for non- <br />residential purposes. Although the Metro Plan designates the property as Low Density <br />Residential, tlus designation preceded the refinement plan designation of the property as <br />Government and Education and does not provide for the efficient development of the subject site <br />as a center of activity for the community. The proposed mixed-use center will allow an <br />integrated development that will receive substantial review that will benefit the neighborhood. <br />and the community of Eugene. <br /> <br />The location of this subject site, located between a major arterial and a m~or collector is not <br />appropriate for low density residential development. The applicant anleliorates this problem by <br /> <br />Santa Clara- Zone Change Application <br />Written Statement ~ August 2, 2007 <br /> <br />Page 22 of 41 <br />