Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the bill as a public hearing and possible work session, the bill did not have a work session scheduled and <br />died in the committee. <br /> <br />Administrative Action <br />When it became apparent that the Legislature would not ban field burning, the Western Environmental <br />Law Center (WELC) asked the Lane Board of Commissioners to request that the Environmental Quality <br />Commission (EQC) use its statutorily granted authority to issue a moratorium on field burning, and in the <br />alternative, request that the EQC find that reasonable and economically feasible, environmentally <br />acceptable alternatives have been developed that warrant cessation of field burning. The City of Eugene <br />joined in Lane County’s action at the direction of the IGR Committee at its June 15, 2007, meeting. <br /> <br />In July and August 2007, the EQC met and took testimony from the public regarding Lane County's <br />request. In response to Lane County and the City’s request, the EQC directed DEQ staff to request $90,000 <br />from the state to conduct a study on the health effects of field burning. Oregon State University proposed <br />that it conduct a study to determine the health effects of field burning as well as to study the alternatives <br />that may be available. The studies would be funded from the burn fees paid by the grass seed growers. <br /> <br />Additionally, the Oregon Seed Growers Association (OSGA) voluntarily agreed not to burn during the <br />“Eugene 08” Olympic Trials and for 10 days after the event; therefore, the EQC did not need to take <br />action on that request. No other action was taken by the EQC. <br /> <br />Subsequent Actions <br />After the EQC released its decision on Lane County and the City’s request, WELC requested an executive <br />session before the Eugene City Council in order to persuade the council to join in a lawsuit against the <br />seed growers to obtain an injunction against field burning. WELC had been in discussion with the Board <br />of Commissioners regarding the possibility of the County being a plaintiff in a lawsuit. <br /> <br />Although WELC first approached Lane County to initiate a lawsuit, the Board of Commissioners has not <br />indicated its willingness or intention to file such a lawsuit. Instead, Lane County has put together a <br />biomass working group, including representatives of Lane Microbusiness, University of Oregon, <br />Northwest Cooperative Development Center, Oregon Environmental Council, Trillium FiberFuels, Novus <br />Group, Lane Council Of Governments, the Good Company; and Lane County Community and Economic <br />Development. The purpose of the work group is to identify economic uses for local biomass, including <br />grass straw, as a value-added product for renewable energy production. In addition, the work group will <br />be working in collaboration with the Oregon Seed Council to identify and develop alternatives for use of <br />grass straw. <br /> <br />In December 2007, in order to help identify options for adding value to grass straw through renewable <br />energy and fuel production, with the goal that implementation of the options would build economic <br />alternatives for grass straw that would supplant current field burning practices and to initiate a pilot <br />project in Lane County using grass straw as a bioenergy source, the Board of Commissioners directed <br />staff to apply for a $250,000 grant from the Field Burning Research Fund in order to facilitate the work of <br />the group. <br /> <br /> <br />OPTIONS UNDER CONSIDERATION <br />There is considerable interest in local action to address field burning. The options for consideration are <br />listed below. <br /> <br /> <br />L:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080220\S080220D.doc <br /> <br />