Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ms. Taylor averred that it was important that action be taken. She believed that people had not voted against <br />the ballot measure because they did not wish to redevelop the downtown area. She felt the message was that the <br />public did not want a large project and did not want to “destroy” what was there. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz said she would honor her council peers’ request to not take action. She felt they could still have a <br />good robust discussion about what the next steps should be. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling, seconded by Mr. Clark, moved to table the motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark expressed his feeling that his colleagues should respect Mr. Zelenka’s and Mr. Pryor’s request. He <br />noted that Mr. Zelenka had participated in the advisory committee process. He said it was important that the <br />community spoke together. <br /> <br />The motion passed, 4:2; councilors Taylor and Bettman voting in opposition. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy stated that the motion would be deferred to December 10. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said they needed to find out if Kemper was still willing to build housing at the Sears site. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz welcomed Mr. Kemper and Mr. Malsin to the meeting. She remarked that she was not surprised by <br />the vote but she had been disappointed. She asked if it would be possible to reconfigure the project and move <br />forward with a different footprint. She wanted to know if KWG Partners would be willing to do a more scaled- <br />back project. <br /> <br />Mr. Kemper, who had driven from Portland to participate in the discussion, said if the City proceeded with a <br />housing project, it could “blow” the opportunity to do something bigger that would be a more desirable project <br />for the downtown. He stated that he was far less enthusiastic about the Sears proposal than he had been 15 <br />months earlier. He would not be inclined to “step up to” the timeline they had agreed upon at the time. He <br />recalled that they had discussed scaling back the density and the parking and whether that made sense, but one <br />of the strongest desires was to create a district with some unique restaurants and retail spaces. He was not sure <br />a scaled-back version of the original concept would work. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy asked for clarification on the original timeline. Mr. Kemper replied that under the original <br />proposal for the Sears site they had intended to break ground in 12 months, but at present he would choose to <br />slow that down. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling thanked the developers for remaining interested. He averred that the third reason the ballot measure <br />had not passed was that the citizens wanted the streets to be fixed, increased public safety, and economic <br />redevelopment. He felt these were legitimate concerns. He favored the proposed motion in the AIS. He did not <br />want to spend General Fund money on the redevelopment project. He also supported inclusion of the properties <br />that were south of Broadway and the Roberts building and Scan Design properties. Additionally, he would <br />support the inclusion of a park space in the redevelopment project only if it was developed along with <br />redevelopment of the downtown area. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark echoed Mr. Poling’s comments. He thanked Mr. Kemper and Mr. Malsin for their time investment in <br />the process. He shared their disappointment in the outcome of the election, but he was sensitive to what the <br />voters said. He also did not favor spending General Fund money on the project until there was a clear way of <br />addressing the needed transportation funding and the need to increase funding for public safety. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene Urban Renewal Agency November 27, 2007 Page 3 <br /> Workshop <br /> <br />