My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4930
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2008 No. 4923-4959
>
Resolution No. 4930
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:50:32 PM
Creation date
3/4/2008 10:00:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
2/25/2008
Document_Number
4930
CMO_Effective_Date
2/25/2008
Author
Mary H. Feldman
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />of the IGR approval. <br /> <br />After the proposed legislative concepts have been reviewed and approved by the full City <br />Council, legislative concepts that have been approved are presented to the Legislature for <br />drafting. The bill, as introduced, is then presented to the IGR Committee under the regular bill <br />reVieW process. <br /> <br />10. Process for Review and Prioritization of Legislation <br />The Legislative session is relatively short and as a result, bills can move quickly through the <br />legislative process. Regardless, the City will maintain a neutral position on any bills not yet <br />reviewed by City staff and acted upon by the IGR Committee. <br /> <br />Review by City staff: <br />. Once the bills are introduced, they are assigned by an IGR staff person to the appropriate <br />LC for review. <br />. Legislative Coordinators (LCs) in the appropriate City department analyze all introduced <br />bills that are of interest to or may affect the City. LC staff is determined by each <br />Department. <br />. LC staff turnaround for review and analysis of a bill is expected to be within 10 working <br />days of the assignment of a bill unless the movement of a bill warrants a faster turn- <br />around. In those cases, IGR staff will contact the LC and arrange for a faster review. <br />. If a bill addresses one or more of the policies presented in the Legislative Policies for that <br />session, the particular policy is noted in the LC stafr s analysis of the bill. <br />. LC staff will relay both the pros and cons of a bill in their comments as well as any <br />amendments that would make the bill more favorable. <br />. LC will assign each bill a priority and a recommendation. <br /> <br />Legislative advocacy is done on the basis of a priority and recommendation system. LC staff <br />recommends a "support," "oppose," "neutral," "monitor," or "drop" recommendation for all <br />reviewed bills. LC staff also recommends a priority of 1, 2, or 3 on all reviewed bills. <br />The three priority assignments for legislative bills are as follows: <br /> <br />PRIORITY ONE BILLS - The issues addressed by the bill are identified in the City's <br />Legislative Policies document. The bill would have a significant impact on City operations, <br />services, or finances in such ways as to fundamentally impact department administration, <br />organization, personnel, allocation of City resources, or local decision-making, either negatively <br />or positively. The issues addressed by the bill are of significant interest to the City even if they <br />do not directly impact the operations, services, or finances of the City. <br /> <br />Lobby Resource Allocation: Both IGR staff in Salem work on the bill, with a high support level <br />from the legislative coordinator(s) assigned to the bill. The Mayor and/or Council members may <br />testify before committees, possibly with both IGR staff and/or a legislative coordinator. IGR staff <br />contacts all or close to all members of all committees the bill is assigned to. Depending on topic <br />and recommendation, IGR staff will also contact as many legislators as possible prior to public <br />hearings or work sessions. In the event of a floor vote, IGR staff contacts as many legislators as <br /> <br />Eugene City Council Operating Agreements - February 25, 2008 <br />Page 15 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.