My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Incompatible Infill (19th and Alder)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 03/10/08 Work Session
>
Item B: Incompatible Infill (19th and Alder)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:13:32 PM
Creation date
3/6/2008 12:11:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/10/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />4.Are there other land use code amendments that would help resolve this issue that wouldn’t <br />conflict with the Metro Plan? <br /> <br />The underlying policy decision here is whether to direct staff to work on this issue separate from <br />the Infill Task Team work. If the council chooses, the following potential code amendments <br />may address the stated compatibility issues and would be consistent with the Metro Plan: <br /> <br />th <br />? <br /> <br />Overlay zone limiting building height along the north side of 19 Avenue, requiring a <br />more extensive height transition between zones, or requiring buildings to step back in <br />height. <br /> <br />? <br /> <br />A code amendment to increase minimum off-street parking spaces required for uses <br />adjacent to Residential Parking Permit areas or within a certain distance of the university, <br />or based on the number of bedrooms rather than units. <br /> <br />The code amendment process may be initiated by the council, and takes approximately four <br />months to complete. Making this new task a high priority on the Planning Commission work <br />plan would require a revisit of the approved work program, and would have an impact on other <br />items currently under way. Should the council decide to pursue this option, staff would seek <br />direction on which adopted work program tasks should be reprioritized. Alternatively, these or <br />other code amendments could be pursued within the context of the Infill Task Team process <br />currently underway. This would afford the benefit of comprehensively assessing the impact of <br />the proposed solution as it relates to potential development proposals in the immediate vicinity, <br />and those that could be proposed in other parts of the city. It would also allow other solutions <br />that may not have been suggested by residents or staff to be explored and refined before they are <br />implemented. <br /> <br /> <br />5.Should we expand the definition of infill to address not only the number of apartments in <br />buildings, but also the number of residents per apartment? <br /> <br />This is a suggestion that staff recommends be passed on to the ICS Task Team for evaluation. <br />As the Task Team gets further into examining the issues, this problem, specifically as it relates to <br />parking requirements near the university, will be addressed. <br /> <br />th <br /> <br />6.Should we request that the area directly south of the University on 19 between Hilyard and <br />Agate be a test case for the ICS Task Team’s work? <br /> <br />As previously mentioned, the ICS Task Team is in the process of establishing committees to <br />work on specific issues. One of the committees will deal with compatibility issues surrounding <br />multiple-family development. There are two other issue committees, generally dealing with 1) <br />single-family development and 2) large subdivisions and edge development. The council could <br />encourage the task team to prioritize one set of issues or geographic area. However, there are <br />other neighborhoods across the city that are experiencing the impacts of incompatible infill, and <br />the council needs to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of directing staff and task team <br />work to focus on a particular area or issue at the exclusion of others. <br /> <br /> <br />F:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080310\S080310B.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.