Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Bettman averred that the reconciliation was not specific to the way the budget was looked at. She <br />asserted that it was “just numbers” and the justification were “always just in terms of … doing this to be <br />consistent with the budgeting process.” She wanted to see a breakdown of the $12.9 million. She <br />understood that some of the funds that had beginning working capital that turned out to be higher than <br />necessary were not General Fund. She asserted that the money was being “funneled” back into the <br />departments. <br /> <br />Ms. Murdoch said she was unsure how she could quickly satisfy that requirement in that there were <br />thousands of transactions. She related that she and her staff had worked long hours on it. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman questioned whether the $12.9 million could really represent “thousands of transactions.” <br />Ms. Murdoch reaffirmed that this was so. She asked what information would satisfy Councilor Bettman’s <br />concerns. She explained that the Finance Division had journals with hundreds of lines of beginning working <br />capital adjustments. She said the City had “many, many” purchase orders; the purchase order encumbrance <br />reconciliation took all of the outstanding purchase orders and looked at what was actually spent and what <br />the balances were. She stated that staff tried to inform the council by each fund what each of those <br />encumbrance balances were, but if the councilor wished to know where every one of the encumbrances went <br />back in each department it would be time consuming. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman averred that she was not interested in the encumbrances. She said she would be happy if <br />staff indicated that two-thirds of the money was to pay for projects that were planned and funded in 2007, <br />but the money was not expended in 2007. Ms. Murdoch responded that this was what staff attempted to do <br />in the transaction summary by showing every fund, every capital carryover reconciliation, beginning <br />working capital reconciliation, and so on. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman observed that there had been an increase of $1.236 million in the Telecom Fund. She <br />wanted to know if this was money that was appropriated for something, and did not get expended, or was <br />additional money. Ms. Murdoch replied that $701,202 of that amount was the result of the beginning <br />working capital reconciliation and the encumbrance estimate reconciliation. She further explained that <br />$307,000 was the result of capital projects to complete the satellite radio receiver site upgrade approved on <br />Fiscal Year (FY) 07 Supplemental Budget 1. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman averred that there was no reason that the unencumbered money from the Telecom Fund <br />could not be put into the reserve for revenue shortfall. <br /> <br />Ms. Murdoch stated that there was $1 million in existing appropriation, or previously authorized telecom <br />projects, which was not being reappropriated out of the $1.2 million. She said staff tried with every fund to <br />inform the council as to what exactly was happening with the money. She welcomed any specific questions. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the City Council meeting and convened a meeting of the Eugene Urban Renewal <br />Agency at 9:17 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council December 10, 2007 Page 10 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />