Laserfiche WebLink
taxpayers of Eugene had been. Additionally, he said based on the current rate of inflation he would <br />recommend placing the bond for the Road Fund on the May ballot as the cost of repairs would increase. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said the $303,752 allocated for FY08 and appropriated as an inter-fund transfer from the <br />downtown debt service to another fund for urban renewal was for the consultant and legal costs and staff in <br />FY 08. She asserted that now another $300,000 was being added to this and she wanted to know why the <br />number had doubled. Community Development Division Manager Mike Sullivan explained that the scale of <br />the West Broadway citizen process had not been considered when the budget had been approved. He said <br />consultants had been brought on as part of the process and their fees had been a little over $100,000. He <br />explained that the cost also included the cost of appraisals and the potential cost for a relocation consultant. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman expressed confusion. She asserted that all of those things had been anticipated in the <br />first allocation. Mr. Sullivan reiterated that the cost of the consultant was not anticipated ahead of time, nor <br />was the scope of the citizen process. He stressed that the council had directed staff to engage the consultants <br />specifically for that purpose over a relatively short time period during the summer. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman observed that $205,000 had been added to the non-departmental miscellaneous fiscal <br />transactions and asked what it had been for. Ms. Murdoch replied that this was an adjustment in funds that <br />went directly back into downtown revitalization. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked if anyone else was “curious why that more than doubled.” She said she was <br />curious and wanted to see a memorandum explaining what the original $300,000 had been spent on and <br />what the additional $300,000 had been spent on. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz, seconded by Councilor Pryor, moved to adopt Resolution 1045 adopting a <br />Supplemental Budget; making appropriations for the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of <br />Eugene for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2007, and ending June 30, 2008. Roll call <br />vote; the motion passed, 7:1; Councilor Bettman voting in opposition. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the meeting of the Eugene Urban Renewal Agency and reconvened the meeting of <br />the Eugene City Council at 9:43 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />5. ACTION: <br /> <br />An Ordinance Concerning Annexation and Withdrawal Procedures; Amending Sections 2.212, <br />9.7055, 9.7205, and 9.8035 of the Eugene Code, 1971; Repealing Existing Sections 9.7800 to <br />9.7885 of that Code; Adding New Sections 9.7800, Through 9.7835 and Sections 9.8115 Through <br />9.8121 to that Code; Declaring an Emergency; and Providing an Effective Date <br /> <br />City Manager Jones explained that under new State law the City must have a process for any new <br />annexation request starting January 2, 2008. She underscored that in order for this to occur the City must <br />adopt a new ordinance at the present meeting. She noted that there had been a lot of discussion and one <br />public hearing on the item. She stated that there were two versions of the ordinance, Attachment A, which <br />consisted of the original draft with minor edits suggested by the Planning Commission, and Attachment B <br />which included the same adjustments as Attachment A plus larger policy changes based on comments made <br />by Councilor Bettman. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council December 10, 2007 Page 13 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />