Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to amend the proposed ordinance <br />in Attachment A with the aforementioned deletions. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy asked for a motion to extend the time. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz, seconded by Councilor Pryor, moved to extend the meeting by 15 minutes. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling noted that when a motion was on the table there was no requirement for a motion to extend <br />and the motion was not acted upon. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark wanted to ensure that the City allowed the appropriate extension of service to people within <br />the UGB and not outside of the UGB. He felt a lot of the distrust of the River Road/Santa Clara residents <br />stemmed from what had been required of them to hook up to sewer service in a previous time. He said he <br />was trying to avoid a situation where the County would allow development in non-contiguous places on <br />county land where at some point a future owner would want to annex and would be required to hook up to <br />sewer service along with the according costs. He understood that the City would have further work with the <br />County regarding annexation issues in the next year. He believed the extraterritorial extension issue would <br />come up again at this time. He urged his colleagues to oppose the amendment and support the original <br />motion. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling stated that he had read the ordinances as presented in Attachments A and B and nowhere in <br />there had he found reference to any extraterritorial extensions going outside the UGB. He averred that there <br />was “no conspiracy here.” He thought it made sense for people who had property outside the city limits and <br />inside the UGB to be allowed to pay for and hook up to sewer service. He opposed the amendment. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion failed, 5:3; councilors Zelenka, Bettman, and Taylor voting in fa- <br />vor of the amendment. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz, seconded by Councilor Pryor, moved to revise the ordinance to include the <br />following text at the end of code section 9.7815: <br />For annexation applications in the River Road/Santa Clara area the City shall not let an an- <br />nexation application include the right-of-way if by doing so the annexation would cause un- <br />incorporated property to be surrounded as described in ORS 222.750. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling ascertained from City Attorney Klein that the additional language merely restated what the <br />council had done earlier in the year. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the amendment passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to amend the motion to substi- <br />tute Attachment B for Attachment A. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asserted that the difference between Attachment A and Attachment B was that the latter <br />required that extraterritorial extensions come before the City Council. She averred that the language in <br />Attachment A only required a Planning Director’s decision on extraterritorial extensions and that decision <br />was then appealable to the Hearings Official. She declared that this type of issue would not receive a public <br />hearing. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council December 10, 2007 Page 16 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />