Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Taylor said she had been reluctant to delay the condemnation proceedings when it was last <br />addressed. She echoed Councilor Bettman’s remarks related to the value of the properties as a natural <br />resource. She called the purchase of the properties an investment in the future. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz, seconded by Councilor Pryor, moved to extend the meeting by five min- <br />utes. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark clarified that the council had contracted to have an appraisal done and the appraisal was <br />complete. He said the City Attorney had indicated that the appraisal would be entered into any court <br />proceedings no matter what. <br /> <br />City Attorney Klein stated that the appraisal had been given in oral form to the council and had not been <br />written into a report. He confirmed that the information would ultimately come out in court proceedings. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark said it was too much money at a time in which the City could ill afford it. He believed such <br />a large expenditure would violate the public trust. He related that many people indicated to him that they <br />would refer this item out as a petition if it was passed. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling wished to point out that there was not enough money in the Parks and Open Space bond to <br />cover litigation fees and the property purchase. He stated that no federal grant money was available to <br />property that was being taken by eminent domain. He said the cost of the land had increased as property <br />values increased. He added that he was certain that the surrounding neighbors’ property values would <br />increase if the land was turned into park land. He averred that this action did not serve the greater <br />community. He opined that eminent domain was the wrong way to go about purchasing the properties. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka agreed with councilors Bettman and Taylor about the value of the properties but he also <br />agreed with Councilor Ortiz that eminent domain should be the last resort. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy felt that the council was protecting the Amazon Creek headwaters properties for future <br />generations. She believed the Parks and Open Space Bond moneys were being used as intended. She said <br />the City had tried hard to find willing sellers and had tried to work with conservation groups. She stated that <br />so far they had not been able to push this forward. She thought it would be in everyone’s best interest if the <br />City did not have to take eminent domain, but she was not certain that this was possible. She underscored <br />her feeling that the properties were an asset for all of Eugene and not just south Eugene. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the substitute motion failed, 6:2; councilors Bettman and Taylor voting in <br />opposition. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor commented that under normal circumstances he would be willing to postpone the discussion <br />until the opportunity to try different approaches to resolve the purchase of the property without eminent <br />domain had been exhausted. He said the reason he could not support Councilor Zelenka’s motion was that it <br />included an authorization for proceedings of eminent domain. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark asked if it was the intention of the maker of the motion that condemnation proceedings <br />would begin at the deadline or that the council would reconsider those actions at that point. Councilor <br />Zelenka responded that his intention was that should the parties not be in agreement by June the council <br />would authorize the eminent domain proceedings at that time. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council December 10, 2007 Page 19 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />