Laserfiche WebLink
startup, costs that had not been completely expended, a $125,000 contribution from Springfield for <br />the Police Interoperability Grant, <br />$66,550 in one-time funds for River Road/Santa Clara, $154,400 for opportunity siting and <br />standards, and $152,944 for a neighborhood park. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman observed that there was $1.6 million in additional funds available in the <br />beginning working capital in the General Funds main sub-fund and there was new revenue of <br />$619,000. She surmised that out of the $12.9 million there was a $900,000 capital transfer and <br />another $900,000 capital transfer and this would make $1.8 million. Ms. Murdoch clarified that <br />there was only one $900,000 capital transfer. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman countered that she thought the council had directed there to be an “automatic” <br />$900,000 to be placed in a capital transfer. Ms. Murdoch reiterated that there was only the one <br />amount. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said as she went through the budget and reviewed the working capital she <br />understood that about one-third of the $12.9 million was grant money and reappropriations. She <br />noted that in looking at the telecom registration/licensing fund, the beginning working capital had <br />an additional $1.2 million. She asked for an explanation. Ms. Murdoch responded that she would <br />have to look it up specifically. Her best guess was that it consisted of unspent funds from the <br />previous year that were allocated for projects that were not yet completed. She reiterated that the <br />beginning work in capital adjustment always consisted of more revenue or fewer expenditures than <br />had been anticipated when the budget was created months earlier. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz asked if the language that Mr. Barofsky was concerned with could be brought <br />back into the budget document. Ms. Murdoch replied that the council could pass a policy to do <br />so. Councilor Ortiz averred that even if it was no longer required by State statute the council <br />should ensure that it stayed embedded in the budget policy. <br /> <br />Ms. Murdoch stated that the current public process already requires an advertisement with notice <br />for a public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked if the negative balance in the beginning working capital for the Municipal <br />Airport Fund was attributable to money transferred out in order to build a transfer facility from <br />Connect Oregon money. Kurt Corey, Public Works Director, replied that he was uncertain but this <br />would be a good assumption. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Bettman, Ms. Murdoch explained that the beginning <br />working capital adjustment across all funds on a $500 million budget was a reduction of $6.2 <br />million. She stated that there had been increases across all funds in this supplemental budget of <br />$8.3 million that went into the operating budget. She said the capital budget had been reduced by <br />almost $2 million in this supplemental budget. Additionally, there had been transfers, increases to <br />reserves, and balance available as a result of the change in beginning working capital. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council December 10, 2007 Page 10 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />