Laserfiche WebLink
Elizabeth Paul <br />, 3837 Potter Street, stated that she had emphysema and her lung capacity had been <br />reduced to 25 percent. She said field burning affected her lungs and exacerbated her asthma, <br />sometimes causing infections for which she was prescribed a heavy dose of prednisone. She <br />related that at the end of the field burning season she usually found that her lung capacity had <br />dropped perceptibly. <br /> <br />Kathy Hoover <br />, 1316 Audel Avenue, recalled the birth of her grandson in August 2002. She had <br />helped to care for her daughter and grandson in the days after his birth. She related that one hot <br />day when he was a few days old they were forced to close all of the windows because of huge <br />clouds of smoke. It had been very uncomfortable and she promised her grandson she would fight <br />field burning. While she acknowledged the “trials and tribulations” that farmers face she found <br />nothing to convince her that the practice of field burning should be permitted to continue. <br /> <br />Lisa Arkin <br />, 1192 Lawrence Street, thanked Councilor Clark and Mayor Piercy for attending the <br />town hall meeting on field burning. She said she had been asking since the 1980s for a stop to field <br />burning. She stated that a legislative effort to stop the burning had failed. She noted that Oregon <br />State University had conducted “copious” studies on grass seed growing and had determined that <br />there were alternatives to burning. She believed it was unnecessary to burn fields to be a good <br />grass seed farmer. She stressed that the issue was health. She presented a petition signed by <br />approximately 650 people that asked the Eugene City Council to take the legislative steps to end <br /> <br />field burning and to hold a work session on the issue. <br /> <br />David Thor Johnson <br />, 4986 Hunters Glen Drive, thanked the councilors and Mayor for their <br />work. He averred that trees helped to filter the air and as such preserving the Amazon Creek <br />headwaters properties would help to remediate burning practices. He opined that five of the <br />elected officials were doing “the right thing. He asked the council to “stay the course, finish the <br />job, do the right thing, protect the planet, [and] protect the ‘urban growth boundary’ forest.” <br /> <br />Eric Selker <br />, 3765 University Street, explained that he was a biologist. He thought it was “crazy” <br />to burn fields, especially given the extended conversation about global warming and the criticism <br />given to countries like Indonesia and Brazil for burning forest land. He said the main reason he <br />wanted to testify was to support maintaining the Amazon Creek headwaters properties in a natural <br />state. He appreciated efforts made to do so. <br /> <br />th <br />Samantha Chirillo <br />, 157 East 27 Avenue, Apt. 3, co-director of the Cascadia’s Ecosystem <br />Advocates and a member of the Climate Crisis Working Group, recalled that Mayor Piercy had <br />said at a July meeting that the council would do “whatever necessary” to protect the Amazon <br />Creek headwaters forest. She said the council also looked into how it could apply eminent domain <br />proceedings in that situation without being too costly to the City. She related that the two <br />organizations she belonged to had not forgotten this meeting and had been taking people on hikes <br />through the properties in question as they believed it was an important “educational microcosm of <br />a mature forest ecosystem.” <br /> <br />Ms. Chirillo conveyed the organizations’ request to apply eminent domain proceedings to the <br />property for its “unique recreational value” and “ecosystem services” it provided, such as “carbon <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council December 10, 2007 Page 4 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />