Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />C. ACTION: An Ordinance Concerning Motor Vehicle Fuel Dealer's Business License Tax and <br />Amendment Section 3 of Ordinance No. 20337 <br /> <br />Mr. Corey stated that the City’s gas tax was presently set at five cents per gallon, two cents of which would <br />sunset on February 29, 2008. He said the Oregon Petroleum Association (OPA) had pledged at the January <br />14, 2008, public hearing to work toward a statewide gas tax if the two-cent portion of the City’s tax was <br />allowed to sunset. He said in the spirit of cooperation, staff was recommending extending the sunset period <br />by three years instead of repealing it. He said that would allow time for the legislature to address transpor- <br />tation funding during the 2009 session. He said allowing the two cents to sunset at the end of February <br />would create an additional $1.4 million annual deficit in the street repair budget. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor stated she would support a three-year extension of the sunset provision. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka expressed concern about testimony that suggested the decrease in gasoline sales was associated <br />with the two-cent tax. He felt that was unlikely as the entire State had experienced a reduction in gasoline <br />consumption. He said the OPA was vague about its commitment to work on the concept of transportation <br />legislation in 2009. He preferred to keep the tax in place until that funding materialized. He supported <br />extension of the sunset provision. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman supported removing the sunset provision altogether as she was not optimistic that the <br />legislature would provide sufficient funds for road repairs because they would not be able to resist the <br />temptation to dedicate a large portion of that to modernization. She supported the three-year extension as a <br />compromise. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark said he understood that the volume of gasoline sales had decreased in Eugene but been flat or <br />increased in the rest of Lane County during the past two years, which related directly to price competition. <br />He was in general agreement that fuel taxes were a good idea because they were closer to being a user fee. <br />He was unhappy with the council’s decision not to place the issue before voters when gas dealers had <br />gathered enough signatures to place both the three-cent and the two-cent tax on the ballot. In the spirit of <br />compromise he was willing to extend the sunset, although he preferred extending it only until the end of July <br />2009. He hoped the council could work toward a combined solution to transportation system funding, <br />including the commitment of some General Fund moneys. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor remarked that the dilemma was whether to sunset the tax as an incentive to work with the <br />legislature or retain the tax as an incentive and then rescind it if State funding became available. He was <br />willing to extend the sunset to avoid adding $1.4 million to the annual deficit and would work with OPA and <br />the legislature to pass a State gas tax. He said it should be made clear that the extension was only until <br />there was a legislative solution. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling also felt that lower gas sales were the result of competition. He said the council had made a <br />commitment to the public to sunset the two-cent tax and should honor that agreement. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy recollected that the commitment was to rescind the two-cent increase when the problem was <br />solved and that had not yet happened. She noted that the council could not commit future council's to take <br />action. She hoped that a State solution would be beneficial for Eugene. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council January 28, 2008 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />