Laserfiche WebLink
City Attorney Klein pointed out the properties would revert back to the property owners, not to the City, as <br />the City held only the options. <br /> <br />City Attorney Klein indicated his office would prepare text for the council to consider on February 13. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said a council priority was having more people downtown, which meant housing. She asked if <br />there was a way to create a weighted formula for awarding the purchase options that would favor housing. <br />She said she would be willing to transfer the options at no cost if the result was a predominance of housing <br />in a development. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy summarized the motion on the floor as amended through the discussion, saying the council <br />had agreed to direct the agency director to come back with a proposal for the solicitation of offers. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said another downside to the approach being proposed was that the City could be in the <br />position that individuals already holding large blocks of property downtown could buy the options and <br />further consolidate their holdings and then do nothing with their properties. She determined from Mr. Braud <br />that the Connor-Wooley partnership had not contacted the City about the purchase options. She asked how <br />the City could avoid the risk of further consolidation. City Manager pro tem Jones suggested there was <br />nothing to preclude that from happening now because once the options expired, Connor-Wooley could <br />readily purchase them from their owners. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked City Attorney Klein to return with a motion that stated the intent of the council was not <br />to allow further consolidation of properties. City Attorney Klein said he would return with either the text <br />requested or a legal opinion. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman determined that Mr. Pryor declined to accept an amendment related to consolidation of <br />properties as a friendly amendment to the motion on the floor. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman moved that the assignment of the options be carried out in such a way as to <br />avoid consolidation of properties to more than 25 percent of the footprint in a single owner- <br />ship. <br /> <br />The motion died for lack of a second. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman supported the motion on the floor in order to see what staff developed. However, that did not <br />guarantee her future support. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka asked if the City had the discretion to assign the purchase options. City Manager pro tem <br />Jones said yes. She believed that at a minimum, the City could turn down an offer. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor was not willing to do anything to force the business owners to give up their businesses. She <br />thought some of the prices for the properties the City held options on were outrageous and suggested the <br />current tenants would not be able to afford to buy them at those prices. <br /> <br />City Attorney Klein restated the motion: <br /> <br />To direct the agency director to bring back to the URA as soon as possible a methodology <br />for soliciting offers from parties interested in assignment of the purchase options not be- <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 11, 2008 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />