Laserfiche WebLink
outlined by the Transportation Research Board in TR Circular E110, and <br />shall also develop new areas of inquiry. <br />`(2) BENCHMARKS AND GUIDANCE- The research project conducted under <br />paragraph (1) shall be designed to result in the establishment of benchmarks and <br />the provision of practical guidance on how to effectively implement street <br />procedures and designs that will accommodate all types of users along the same <br />facility or corridor including, vehicles, pedestrians, bicycles, and transit use. Such <br />benchmarks and guidance shall focus on changing scoping, design, and <br />construction procedures to more effectively fit the individual modes together into <br />integrated facilities that meet the needs of each in an appropriate balance. Such <br />benchmarks and guidance shall indicate the expected operational and safety <br />performance of alternative approaches to facility design. <br />`(3) BEST PRACTICES REPORT- Not later than 2 years after the date of <br />enactment of this subsection, the Federal Highway Administration shall publish a <br />best practices report showing how transportation agencies have changed their <br />procedures to routinely design safe, effective multi-modal facilities. In <br />establishing such best practices, consideration shall be given to the following <br />areas: <br />`(A) Procedures for identifying the needs of the mix of users, including <br />primary and secondary users that need to be served on various highway <br />functional classes. <br />`(B) The identification of the types and designs of facilities needed to <br />serve each of those types of users. <br />`(C) The identification of barriers to implementation as well as <br />identification of costs associated with implementing complete streets <br />policies. <br />`(4) DATA COLLECTION- In addition to preparing the report under paragraph <br />(3), the Federal Highway Administration shall work with the Bureau of <br />Transportation Statistics and the Federal Transit Association and appropriate <br />Transportation Research Board committees on data collection, including a <br />baseline non-motorized and transit use survey that will be integrated into the <br />National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the development of a survey <br />tool for use by State transportation departments in identifying the multi-modal <br />capacity of State and local road networks.'. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />From: Richard Hughes [mailto:hughes97405@gmail.com] <br />Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 5:12 PM <br />To: *Eugene Mayor and City Council <br />Subject: Crest,Storey and Friendly Street Design <br /> <br />Dear Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council, <br /> <br />The City Council is currently scheduled to review/approve the Crest, Storey, and Friendly Street <br />design on April 14. As proposed, the design does not contain a bike lane. As an avid biker <br />and six year resident of the City, I believe it would be a great disservice to the people of Eugene <br />for this project to be approved without the integration of a bike lane in the overall design. <br /> <br />As you may be aware, on March 3, Senators Harkin and Carper introduced US Senate Bill 2686, <br />known as the Complete Streets Act of 2008. A copy of the bill is pasted below for your <br />reference. The very purpose of the Act "is to ensure that all users of the transportation system, <br />including pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users as well as children, older individuals, and <br />individuals with disabilities, are able to travel safely and conveniently on streets and highways <br />- 17 - <br />Crest Drive CSS Design Recommendation Public Testimony 2/14/08 through 4/8/08 <br />