My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20407
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2008 No. 20401-20425
>
Ordinance No. 20407
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:50:29 PM
Creation date
4/16/2008 2:43:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20407
Document_Title
Amending Metro Plan Land Use Diagram;River Road-Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan Land Use Diagram and Text; amedning Eugene Zoning Map
Adopted_Date
1/14/2008
Approved Date
4/14/2008
CMO_Effective_Date
7/21/2008
Signer
Kitty Piercy
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />To mitigate the significant effect that the proposed amendments will have on the River Road at <br />Hunsaker Lane/Irving intersection, the applicant has proposed the following improvements: <br /> <br />· Construct an additional Hunsaker Lane westbound approach lane. <br />Jurisdiction: Lane County <br />· Construct an additional Green Lane westbound approach lane. <br />Jurisdiction: City of Eugene <br /> <br />The applicant states on pages 17-20 of the Mitten statement that the mitigation is proposed under <br />OAR 660-0 12-0060(2)(e), and also under OAR 660-012-0060(3) if the City chooses to invoke <br />subsection (3). Based on the applicant's TIA and supplemental materials, it is determined that the <br />proposed mitigation measures will not bring the significantly affected facility (River Road at <br />Husaker/Irving) up to the identified function, capacity and performance standards of the facility by <br />the end of the planning period. Specifically, in order to demonstrate compliance with OAR 660- <br />012-0060(1) (as required by subsection (2)(e)), the applicant must provide enough mitigation to <br />increase the performance of the intersection up to the minimum standard identified by Lane County, <br />0.85 v/c. The proposed mitigation, as shown in Table 8 of the TIA (page 33), only improves the <br />perfQrmance of the intersection to 1.19 vie. Accordingly, the applicant's proposed mitigation <br />measures do not meet the requirements of OAR 660-012-0060(1) and OAR 660-012-0060(2)( e). <br /> <br />However, as previously noted, the City may still approve the proposed amendment if the applicant <br />demonstrates compliance with OAR 660-012-0060(3). This provision states that a local <br />goverrunent may approve an amendment that would significantly affect an existing transportation <br />facility without assuring that the allowed land uses are consistent with the function, capacity and <br />performance standards if the applicant can demonstrate compliance with the five requirements of <br />subsection (3)(a) through (e) below. Findings addressing compliance with these requirements are <br />provided below. <br /> <br />OAR 660-012-0060(3)(a) The facility is already performing below the minimum acceptable <br />performance standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan on the date the <br />amendment application is submitted; <br /> <br />Consistent with this subsection, River Road at Hunsaker/Irving is currently performing at 0.91 v/c, <br />which is below the acceptable performance standard of 0.85 vie, as demonstrated in the applicant's <br />TIA in Table 7 (page 29). <br /> <br />OAR 660-012-0060(3)(b) In the absence of the amendment, planned transportation <br />facilities, improvements and services as set forth in section (4) of this rule would not be <br />adequate to achieve consistency with the identified function, capacity or performance <br />standard for that facility by the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP; <br /> <br />As shown in the applicant's analysis in the TIA, in the absence of these amendments, the planned <br />facilities, etc., would not be adequate to achieve consistency with the performance standard of the <br />facility by the end of the planning period, consistent with this subsection. <br /> <br />Findings- November 19,2007 <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.