Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Attorney, stipulating that any future development approval for the site shall require, by <br />the time of development, full and complete construction of an additional westbound <br />approach lane on Hunsaker Lane and an additional westbound approach lane on Green Lane. <br />The restrictive covenants shall be binding on any successive owner(s) of the property, are <br />enforceable by the City of Eugene any may be amended only with the express written <br />consent of the City of Eugene. <br /> <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />2. The proposed text .amendments shall be revised as follows: <br /> <br />. Regarding proposed Recommendation No.5: <br /> <br />To clarify that abutting properties not included in this application ~e not subject to this <br />amendment, revise the first sentence to state: "Notwithstanding Recommendation No.4, <br />development sites abutting south of Green Lane and generally west of the eastern boundary <br />of the former Santa Clara Elementary School Site..." <br /> <br />. Regarding proposed Recommendation No.6: <br /> <br />To clarify which zoning is approved, revise the second sentence to state: "If zoned - <br />commercial, it shall be zoned C-2 and it shall be developed. . ." <br /> <br />Regarding 6.b, the subject site abuts R-l zoning to the northeast and R-2 zoning to the <br />southeast. EC 9.2171(2) already requires C-2 development to be limited to 30 feet in height <br />within 50 feet ofR-l zoning, and to be limited to 35 feet in height within 50 feet ofR-2 <br />zoning. Proposed 6.b only proposes a height restriction where abutting R-l zoning, and <br />furthermore the proposed height limitation of35 feet is actually 5 feet taller than the code <br />already restricts. Therefore, this height limitation should be stricken. <br /> <br />. Regarding proposed Recommendation No.7: <br /> <br />The connection shown on the applicant's Site Concept plan (see applicant's Exhibit 1.2) <br />depicts a Green Lane crossing between the northern 7.3 acre portion of the site and the <br />southern 1.3 acre portion of the site. This is not "midblock" as referred to in proposed <br />Recommendation 7. Therefore, the first sentence should be revised to state: "a pedestrian <br />friendly connection.. . shall be provided at to cross Green Lane between the former Santa <br />Clara School Site and a property south of Green Lane and shall include..." <br /> <br />Findings- November 19,2007 <br />Page 34 <br />