Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> approve <br />3.Ordinance 3: An ordinance and findings that the application, based on the findings <br />adopted by the County. <br /> <br />The council directed staff to prepare the three ordinances described above. A second meeting has been <br />scheduled to provide the council additional time to review the findings and deliberate before acting. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The applicant, Delta Property Company, requests that the Statewide Planning Goal Inventory for <br />Significant Mineral and Aggregate Sites be amended to allow a 72.31 acre expansion of the existing 474 <br />acre sand and gravel operation. The application is a “Post-Acknowledgement Plan Amendment” <br />(PAPA) as provided for by Goal 5 Rule for mineral and aggregate resources, Oregon Administrative <br />Rules 660-023-180. The Metro Plan Designation is proposed to be changed from “Agriculture” to <br />“Sand & Gravel.” If the Metro Plan amendments are approved by both the City and the County, the <br />County has independent authority over the applicant’s request to change the site’s zoning from <br />“E30/Exclusive Farm Use (LC 16.212)” to “SG/Sand, Gravel & Rock Products (LC 16.217).” The <br />proposal requests a variance to Lane Code 16.217(4)(b)(v)(dd) to excavate within the 150’ setback along <br />East Santa Clara waterway in order to complete a low permeability barrier to reduce groundwater flow <br />into the excavated area. If the City approves the Metro Plan amendments, the County’s February 20, <br />2008, decision would result in the County’s approval of the variance and the zone change request (with <br />conditions). <br /> <br />On February 21, 2007, the City Council began deliberations and made a tentative decision (not formally <br />a part of an adopted ordinance and findings) that the applicant failed to demonstrate the site contained <br />significant resources. Adoption of an ordinance and findings that conclude there is not a significant <br />resource on the site would result in a City decision denying the application. The County Board acted to <br />approve the application on February 20, 2008. <br /> <br />If the City and County adopt different decisions, the matter will be referred to the Metropolitan Policy <br />Committee (MPC) for dispute resolution. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />The subject property is currently designated by the Metro Plan as Agriculture, not Sand and Gravel. The <br />Metro Plan encourages the use of the Urban Growth Boundary and park lands to separate sand and <br />gravel resources from residential areas. The subject property is separated from urban residential <br />properties on the other side of the UGB only by the East Santa Clara waterway, which is a protected <br />Goal 5 water resource site inside the UGB. <br /> <br />The Metro Plan contains these policies that address this topic: <br /> <br />·Sand and gravel sites identified as significant by the Metro Plan shall be protected in <br />accordance with the requirements of the Goal 5 Rule. (Metro Plan page III-C-11) <br /> <br /> <br />·When development is allowed to occur in the floodway or floodway fringe, local regulations <br />shall control such development in order to minimize the potential danger to life and property. <br />(Metro Plan page III-C-16) <br /> <br /> <br /> F:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080421\S080421A.doc <br /> <br />