Laserfiche WebLink
(b) The local government shall determine existing or approved land uses within the <br />impact area that will be adversely affected by proposed mining operations and shall <br />specify the predicted conflicts. For purposes of this section, "approved land uses" are <br />dwellings allowed by a residential zone on existing platted lots and other uses for which <br />conditional or final approvals have been granted by the local government. For <br />determination of conflicts from proposed mining of a significant aggregate site, the <br />local government shall limit its consideration to the following: <br /> <br />Uses on land surrounding the proposed expansion area, and within the impact area, consist of <br />residential, agricultural and industrial uses. Residences are located south, west and north of the <br />proposed expansion area. The nearest residence (at the southern terminus of Admiral Street) is <br />located approximately 40 feet north of the boundary of the proposed expansion property. <br />Residential subdivisions at urban densities are approved and the dwellings are under construction <br />due west of the expansion site, inside the Eugene Urban Growth Boundary. The Urban Growth <br />Boundary is located in the stream/wetland that is the western border of the proposed expansion <br />site. A subdivision application for additional homes located immediately west of the expansion <br />site (Silver Meadows Second addition) is pending. A 15.4 acre vacant property owned by <br />Eugene School District 4J is located immediately north of the proposed expansion site. A single <br />agricultural field containing nursery tree stock is located within the impact area, northeast of the <br />proposed expansion area. The existing Delta Sand and Gravel Company facility is located <br />directly east of the proposed expansion area and the Eugene Sand and Gravel facility is located <br />further east across the Willamette River from the Delta Sand and Gravel Company property. <br />(A) Conflicts due to noise, dust, or other discharges with regard to those <br />existing and approved uses and associated activities (e.g., houses and schools) <br />that are sensitive to such discharges; <br /> <br />The applicant has identified the potential conflicts from the proposed mining of the subject <br />property due to noise, dust and other discharges associated with mining and processing activities <br />in the proposed expansion area. Those conflicts are as follows: <br />Noise <br /> : <br />The applicant retained Daly-Standlee, Oregon registered engineers, to prepare a noise study for <br />the proposed expansion area. That study, titled “Report On Noise Study for Delta Sand & <br />Gravel New Mining Area”, dated June 14, 2005, is attached to the application. The report <br />concludes that certain areas within the impact area could be subjected to mining activity noise <br />above the limit allowed by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) for a “new <br />noise source” on a “previously unused site.” (See Exhibits 1 (Exhibit F) as updated on <br />November 14-15, 2005 to expand Zone 4; Exhibits 33, part (e), and 37 by Arthur Noxon; <br />Exhibit 52 by Charles Oppenheimer; Exhibits 58 and 60, Daly-Standlee; and Exhibit 59, peer <br />review by John Hector; Exhibit 270, from DSA responding to Noxon testimony.) The testimony <br />of Arthur Noxon contests the applicant’s conclusions. <br /> <br />Dust and Engine Emissions <br />The applicant retained Bridgewater to prepare an evaluation of air quality issues associated with <br />the proposed expansion area. That evaluation, titled “Air Quality Evaluation”, dated June 1, <br />2005, is attached to the application (Exhibit 1). The evaluation concludes that aggregate mining <br />and processing activities could generate dust and potentially create a nuisance condition for the <br />nearby residences due to unusual or annoying amounts of dust present in the ambient air. <br /> <br />Other “discharges” under the administrative rule could be defined to include air emissions from <br />diesel engines. However, the Bridgewater evaluation concludes that, due to the small quantity <br />of onsite excavation equipment and haul trucks, and the distant location of the equipment to one <br />another and the proposed expansion area boundary, no conflict due to diesel exhaust will result <br />Ordinance - 15 <br /> <br />