Item A: Delta Sand and Gravel - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

identified by the applicant within a 1,500 foot impact area were incorporated into draft conditions of approval by Lane County ((see staff report for November 1, 2006 public hearing, Attachment 1, Exhibit C: Lane County draft Ordinance No. PA 1238, Conditions Necessary to Minimize Conflicts). The City Council finds that this requirement has been satisfied. (e) A site plan indicating the location, hours of operation, and other pertinent information for all proposed mining and associated uses. The application includes a site plan indicating the location, hours of operation, and other pertinent information for all proposed mining and associated uses. See File Record No.1, Original Delta application, Introduction, in the 12 August 2005 application by Delta for a zoning change entitled “Application for amendment of the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan comprehensive plan map and significant aggregate resource site inventory and zone change from EFU to sand gravel and rock products.” Based on the findings, above, the City Council finds that the application contains adequate materials to satisfy OAR 660-023-0180(8). OAR 660-023-180(2)(b) -- Local governments shall apply the criteria in section (3) or (4) of this rule, whichever is applicable, rather than OAR 660-023-0030(4), in determining whether an aggregate resource site is significant. The applicant submitted information to address OAR 660-023-180(3). The criteria in OAR 660- 023-180(4) are not applicable. Step 2 Determine if the resource site is significant OAR 660-023-180(3) -- An aggregate resource site shall be considered significant if adequate information regarding the quantity, quality, and location of the resource demonstrates that the site meets any one of the criteria in subsections (a) through (c) of this section, except as provided in subsection (d) of this section: Above, the City finds that the applicant provided adequate information for evaluating the significance of the resource. Based on these findings, the Council determines that the applicant has not met its burden of proof to establish that the aggregate resource meets the “significance” requirements of OAR 660- 023-0180(3) regarding quantity and quality of the aggregate resource. The Council evaluated the aggregate resource in accordance with OAR 660-023-0180(3), the pertinent parts of which follow: (3) An aggregate resource site shall be considered significant if adequate information regarding the quantity, quality, and location of the resource demonstrates that the site meets any one of the criteria in subsections (a) through (c) of this section, except as provided in subsection (d) of this section: (a)A representative set of samples of aggregate material in the deposit on the site meets applicable Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) specifications for Ordinance - 7