Laserfiche WebLink
Summary of Finding: Consistent <br /> <br />Statewide Planning Goal 10: Housing <br />Summary of Finding: Consistent <br /> <br />Statewide Planning Goal 11: Public Facilities and Services <br />Summary of Finding: Consistent <br /> <br /> <br />Statewide Planning Goal 12: Transportation <br />Summary of Finding: Consistent <br /> <br />Statewide Planning Goal 13: Energy <br />Summary of Finding: Consistent <br /> <br />Statewide Planning Goal 14: Transition from Rural to Urban Land Use <br />Summary of Finding: Consistent <br /> <br />Statewide Planning Goal 15: Willamette River Greenway. <br />Summary of Finding: Not applicable. <br /> <br /> <br />Statewide Planning Goals 16, 17, 18, 19:Estuarine Resources, Coastal Shorelines, <br />Beaches and Dunes, and Ocean Resources <br />Summary of Finding: Not applicable. <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene Code 9.7730(3) Criteria for Approval of Metro Plan Amendment: <br /> <br />(b) Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan <br />internally inconsistent. <br /> <br />Summary of Finding: In LUBA’s decision in Eugene Sand and Gravel Inc. v. <br />Lane County, 44 Or LUBA 50, rev’d in part on other grounds, 189 Or App 21, <br />74 P3d 1085 (2003), LUBA found that the City is prohibited from considering <br />or applying local plan policies that go beyond OAR 660-023-0180 in reviewing <br />this proposal. Since previous findings have identified other bases for denial of <br />the proposal, the City does not address the Metro Plan policies. <br /> <br /> <br />