Laserfiche WebLink
? <br /> Transportation planning and funding – the Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC) has adopted the <br />Regional Transportation Plan that called for the TransPlan to be consistent with it; <br />? <br /> The Eugene council desired a discussion on Area Commissions on Transportation (ACTs) and the <br />transportation funding needed for preservation and maintenance. <br /> <br />Mayor Leiken stated the following: <br />? <br /> The Springfield City Council was in agreement that the TransPlan work plan issue was important as <br />were the Metro Plan UGB changes that had arisen from HB 3337. <br />? <br /> Springfield wanted to bring forward the need for an update of the population projections. Mayor <br />Leiken averred that Eugene and Springfield needed to have separate projections. He said Springfield <br />prepared its final draft of the residential lands study and was initiating a study of industrial lands. <br />He wanted to ensure that, with that information, the projections would show where the two cities <br />needed to go. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stewart presented three items from the Lane Board of County Commissioners: <br />? <br /> The commissioners had concerns related to the Oregon Revised Statute (ORS) 190 agreements of <br />urban transition between the city limits and UGBs and that sometimes citizens in that area did not <br />feel they had representation; <br />? <br /> Financial/revenue concerns – property tax revenue was substantially reduced by ballot measures 5, <br />47, and 50 and the County was experiencing difficulty in meeting the demands of its citizens for ser- <br />vices. One of the problems lay in the Metro Plan and what it required to create a special district; <br />? <br /> The commissioners also had concerns regarding how resource areas, farm ground and forest ground, <br />could be protected as growth was allowed to occur. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stewart remarked that none of the elected officials around the table were present when some <br />of the agreements and working documents had been established, such as the Metro Plan. He shared the <br />frustration other elected officials felt as to how those agreements applied and as to whether they were <br />working in the present. He agreed that it might be time to look into them and see if they could be improved <br />to help serve the citizens better. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stewart encouraged the elected officials who were present to make comments that were <br />constructive and positive. <br /> <br />Discussion – Preferred Approach(es) to Address Issues and Establishment of Priorities <br /> <br />Commissioner Stewart asked to go around the table in order to garner input on preferred approaches to <br />addressing the issues. He noted that the Joint Elected Officials would likely have to meet again since it <br />would not be possible to tackle all of the issues in one sitting. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy suggested forming cross-jurisdictional groups to meet given the magnitude of the issues. <br /> <br />Eugene Councilor Bettman believed the issues were shared but the strategies of the jurisdictions were <br />different. She pointed out that all of the jurisdictions wanted to improve public safety but she believed the <br />County wished to establish a special district to do so. She recalled that the Eugene City Council had not <br />supported the establishment of such a district in the past. She acknowledged that the Metro Plan amend- <br />ments would have to be dealt with given the passage of HB 3337. She thought the cities of Eugene and <br />Springfield could come up with separate drafts for the amendments and then reconcile the two. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Joint Elected Officials— February 12, 2008 Page 2 <br /> Lane Board of County Commissioners and Eugene and Springfield City Councils <br /> <br />