My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: City Response to Lane County Budget Crisis
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 05/12/08 Work Session
>
Item B: City Response to Lane County Budget Crisis
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:12:14 PM
Creation date
5/9/2008 9:29:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/12/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Potential City of Eugene Responses to Lane County FY 08-09 Proposed Budget <br />ATTACHMENT A <br />One-Time Recommended Gap <br />Service Area Reductions/Eliminations Urban/Rural Impacts <br />Funding, if Eugene Responds <br />?The impact to the municipalities would <br />?The capacity to serve civil process would <br />be a delay in the timely service of civil <br />decrease by one third. This reduction would <br />process documents. Some cities in Lane <br />Civil Service <br />require the remaining patrol force to serve more <br />County already serve a large percentage of <br />civil papers, further restricting the capacity to <br />their own subpoenas and other documents <br />respond to calls for service. <br />to ensure timely delivery. <br /> ?Dispatch would have fewer staff and there ?The lack of available resources would <br />would likely be a reduction in incoming probably result in an increased number of <br />Dispatch <br /> <br />administrative phone lines (not 911 capacities). calls to other police agencies. <br />? <br />Less staff would result in increased <br />booking times, taking arresting officers an <br />Records <br />?Reductions of Records Officers. <br />additional 20 minutes to an hour. <br />Responses to public requests would slow. <br />?Restricted hours for the release/pickup <br />of property. <br />?The property and evidence staff would be <br />Property/Evidence <br />?Capacity to assist in the field with large <br />reduced by half. <br />or unusual scenes or property/evidence <br />collection would be eliminated. <br />?25% reduction to the Court security / <br />transportation unit would mean fewer deputies <br />present in the courthouse to provide security and <br />Courthouse Security <br /> <br />respond in a timely fashion to take persons into <br />custody (these “new custody arrests” currently <br />occur at a rate of over 600 per year). <br /> <br />May 6, 2008 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.