Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes

Home Browse Search

In response to a question form Ms. Bettman, Ms. Holmes explained that the Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) increase was given automatically in the summer. The amendment passed, 4:3; Ms. Ortiz, Ms. Taylor, and Ms. Bettman voting in opposition. The motion, as amended, passed unanimously, 7:0. Mr. Zelenka asked when the other employee evaluations would be undertaken. Ms. Holmes replied that she would provide that information to the councilors. B. WORK SESSION: Lane County Budget Issues Mayor Piercy welcomed Faye Stewart, Chair of the Lane Board of County Commissioners, to the meeting and expressed the council’s appreciation for his willingness to join them. City Manager pro tem Jones explained that Mr. Stewart was present as a follow-up to the request for a report on the County budget made by the City Council at the Joint Elected Officials meeting held on February 12. Mr. Stewart thanked the council for the opportunity. He noted that he had provided hard copies of the information he would present to the councilors and ascertained they had received them. He said the board had asked staff to prepare three budgets, one with renewal of the “Save Our Rural Schools” funding which would hold services at the current level, one that averaged the drawdown that would happen over the course of three years that was included in the proposed Wyden-DeFazio four-year extension of the act, and one that addressed a $50 million loss to the budget. He explained that the money was specified so that approxi- mately $20 million went into the General Fund budget, comprising approximately one-third of that budget, and the remainder was allocated to the Public Works Department for road funds. He stated that the latter was mandated to be spent on the transportation system. Mr. Stewart reported that during the United Front lobbying effort in Washington, DC, also attended by Mayor Piercy and Ms. Taylor, he met with Senator Reid’s office and also with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s office. He had heard from both of them that they were not certain of the timeline for reauthorization of the funding or if it would be reauthorized at all. He related that concern had been expressed in the Speaker’s office regarding how long the need for this funding would continue, given that the act had been designed to be a transition from the timber harvest payments to something else. He stated that on the Senate side there was not a level of support in the Senate to attach the funding to any type of bill or pass it if it was included in a bill. He said since his trip, it looked like the only vehicle that could help the County prior to July 1 was the supplemental war funding, which was being worked on by both houses. The County had not heard confirmation that the funding would be proposed to be renewed as part of that budget, but the commissioners had been encouraged with recent news that the House of Representatives bill could include a one-year extension of the payments and the Senate bill could include the proposal for the four-year drawdown level of funding. He stressed that it was already April 9 and there was no bill moving forward at this time. He noted that at this same time last year the bill was in the house and had been voted on, though the President vetoed it. Mr. Stewart stated that the County was required to have a balanced budget by July 1, and because no funding was imminent they were forced to prepare to downsize the County services. He provided a report MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 9, 2008 Page 4 Work Session