Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Although not currently done, it is possible for each jurisdiction to have its own TSP under the <br />umbrella of a single, regional RTSP. <br /> <br />When TransPlan was adopted in 2002, the Regional Transportation Plan covered the same <br />geographic area covered by TransPlan. However, following the 2000 Census, the federal <br />government designated the metropolitan area as a Transportation Management Area (metropolitan <br />areas exceeding 200,000 population) that also included Coburg. TransPlan currently serves as both <br />the TSP and RTSP for Eugene, Springfield, and metropolitan Lane County. However, this will need <br />to change relatively soon so that the RTSP can also include Coburg. One scenario for accomplishing <br />this change is for TransPlan to evolve into an RTSP that includes Coburg and for Eugene, <br />Springfield, and Coburg to each have their own TSP. <br /> <br /> <br />3.Every other year, the Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) adopts a new State Transportation <br />Improvement Program (STIP). The STIP is similar to a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and its <br />purpose is to identify, prioritize, fund, and schedule transportation projects and programs. The OTC <br />adopted the 2008-11 STIP in the fall of 2007. The MPC has already approved regional priorities for <br />the 2010-13 STIP and has provided guidance to the OTC for the STIP cycles that cover 2010-15 <br />should a large transportation funding package be passed by the state legislature. Work on the 2012- <br />15 STIP would typically begin in early 2009 with OTC approval in late 2011. The STIP is intended <br />to be consistent with TSPs that have been approved by local elected bodies. However, because the <br />horizon year for TransPlan is 2015, it is problematic for the 2010-15 STIP to program funds in our <br />metropolitan area. <br /> <br />The TransPlan horizon year was chosen because the Eugene-Springfield population was projected to <br />reach 286,000 by 2015 and both the Metro Plan and TransPlan are based on accommodating this <br />population. However, due to slower than projected population growth, it is now expected that the <br />city’s population will not reach that number until around 2023. <br /> <br /> <br />4.The Comprehensive Lands Assessment that is being conducted by the Planning Division in part to <br />meet the requirements of House Bill 3337 may lead to proposed amendments to the Metro Plan. It <br />will be important for any TransPlan updates to be consistent with land use assumptions or policy <br />direction the council provides following the conclusion of the comprehensive lands assessment and <br />analysis. <br /> <br />Since the MPC approved the RTP update, staff from Eugene and other local jurisdictions have held <br />numerous meetings with Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and Department of Land <br />Conservation and Development (DLCD) staff to develop a proposed work plan for addressing all of <br />these issues over the next several years. While the work plan has not been finalized, it is likely to <br />include the following elements: <br /> <br />·Complete a report on the progress of the TransPlan Alternative Performance Measures. <br /> <br />·Initiate a Post Acknowledgement Plan Amendment (PAPA) to (1) remove the West Eugene <br />Parkway from the TransPlan project list with the understanding that the project lists will be made <br />entirely consistent through a full TransPlan update to take place within the next several years, <br />and (2) extend the Metro Plan and TransPlan horizon year until around 2023 which is consistent <br />with observed population growth in Eugene and Springfield. <br /> <br />·Determine the framework of TSPs and RTSP that will serve the metropolitan area. <br /> L:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080428\S080428B.doc <br /> <br />