Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />As a result of the passage of Senate Bill 417, the City of Eugene assumed responsibility for processing these <br />requests. The long-standing policies regarding extraterritorial extensions were subsequently codified in <br />Ordinance No. 20400 as the approval criteria for any new requests. Given the explicit nature of the policies, <br />this ordinance established a Type II process which required approval of the Planning Director. However, <br />following further discussion at the January 23, 2008, work session, the City Council expressed concern that <br />some of these requests could be potentially significant or controversial and felt it more appropriate to have <br />such applications elevated to a City Council review. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment on April 22, 2008. Following <br />the close of the public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed <br />amendments consistent with the City Council’s motion. As of this date, no written testimony has been <br />received on this matter. Two individuals spoke as neutral parties at the Planning Commission public <br />hearing, requesting clarification of statements in the staff report. <br /> <br />Staff has attached the Agenda Item Summary to the Planning Commission, dated April 22, 2008 as well as <br />the Agenda Item Summary to the Mayor and City Council regarding the January 23, 2008 work session on <br />extraterritorial extensions to provide further background on this matter. <br /> <br />Draft Ordinance <br />The draft ordinance revises the process for extraterritorial extensions as described in the council’s motion <br />above. This revision would require that the City Council hold a public hearing and be the decision maker <br />for all extraterritorial extensions. The proposed ordinance also amends the public notification requirements <br />for all extraterritorial extensions, consistent with the City Council motion. <br /> <br />In addition to the council-directed amendment, staff has included another amendment to address an <br />oversight that resulted in the original ordinance adoption in December, 2007. Prior to the City Council’s <br />vote to adopt Ordinance No. 20400, a motion to amend the ordinance was approved by the City Council <br />which increased the requirement for public notification for annexations from 10 to 30 days prior to council <br />consideration. EC 9.7820(1)(c) was revised accordingly, however the motion failed to include a reference <br />to a second portion of the ordinance, EC 9.7820, which contained similar language. Staff is therefore <br />including this proposed amendment to fulfill the original intent of the council. This amendment would <br />ensure that in cases where the City Council decides to hold a public hearing for a proposed annexation, <br />public notice shall be provided 30 days (as opposed to 14 days) in advance of the hearing. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />This item is intended as a follow-up to the recent proceedings regarding the adoption of Ordinance No. <br />20400. That ordinance was adopted as a result of a state mandate (SB 417) which required local <br />jurisdictions to assume the responsibilities for processing annexation requests. <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br /> <br />The City Council may consider the following options: <br />1. Approve the proposed ordinance <br />2. Approved the proposed ordinance with specific modifications as determined by the City Council <br />3. Deny the proposed ordinance <br /> <br /> Y:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080519\S0805193.docm <br /> <br />