Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Background <br />An extra-territorial extension is defined in the current ordinance (No. 20400) as an extension <br />of water or sewer service from inside the city limits to serve property located outside the city <br />limits. The current ordinance further restricts these extensions to property within the Urban <br />Growth Boundary, except as provided for in previously approved resolutions. These <br />exceptions include the previously approved service to the Mahlon Sweet Airport and Lane <br />Community College. This proposed amendment will maintain that specific limitation. <br /> <br />As the Planning Commission will recall, the Boundary Commission had the authority to <br />consider requests for extraterritorial extensions prior to the enactment of Senate Bill 417, <br />which abolished the Boundary Commission. In transferring this responsibility to the City, <br />there are no state statutes or other city requirements which specified the review process, or <br />appropriate decision maker. <br /> <br />The City Council adopted specific resolutions many years ago regarding extraterritorial <br />extensions. These resolutions included specific policies which served as the basis from <br />which the City would make its recommendation to the Boundary Commission. These <br />policies were subsequently codified in the recent adoption of Ordinance No. 20400. Given <br />the explicit nature of the policies, the draft ordinance proposed a Type II process which <br />required approval of the Planning Director. Ordinance No. 20400 was adopted by the City <br />Council, which included this Type II process. However, following further discussion at the <br />January 23, 2008 work session, the City Council expressed concern that some of these <br />requests could be potentially significant or controversial and felt it more appropriate to have <br />such applications elevated to a City Council review. <br /> <br />Draft Ordinance <br />The draft ordinance revises the process for extraterritorial extensions as described in the <br />Council’s motion above. This revision would require that the City Council hold a public <br />hearing and be the decision maker for all extraterritorial extensions. The originally adopted <br />ordinance required that the Planning Director be the decision maker. In addition, the <br />proposed ordinance includes the specific noticing requirements for all extraterritorial <br />extensions. <br /> <br />As noted above, the existing ordinance specifically limits any future extraterritorial extension <br />requests to sites within the Eugene’s Urban Growth Boundary. Although State Law does <br />enable some limited ability to extend urban services outside of urban growth boundaries, the <br />City Council specifically directed the current ordinance to be limited to requests inside the <br />urban growth boundary. Since the proposed amendments do not revise this provision, <br />compliance with applicable State Statutes is ensured. <br /> <br />In addition to the Council directed amendment, staff has included an additional amendment <br />to address an oversight that resulted in the original ordinance adoption in December, 2007. <br />Prior to the Council vote to adopt Ordinance No. 20400, a motion to amend the ordinance <br />was approved which changed the requirement for public notification for annexations from 14 <br />to 30 days prior to Council consideration. EC 9.7820(1)(c) was revised accordingly, <br />however the motion failed to include a reference to a second portion of the ordinance, EC <br />9.7820, which contained the same language. Staff is therefore including this proposed <br />amendment to fulfill the original intent of the Council. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />