My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: MUPTE Boundary and Selection Criteria
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 05/27/08 Work Session
>
Item B: MUPTE Boundary and Selection Criteria
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:14:15 PM
Creation date
5/23/2008 9:26:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/27/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MUPTE Guidelines <br />The current MUPTE application packet is provided as Attachment A. This includes the adopted local <br />standards. Public benefits are at the core of the program. Applicants must currently respond to a list of <br />public benefits including sustainability features, responsiveness to adjacent historic resources, building <br />material quality, design elements, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible units, home ownership <br />and solicitation of neighborhood association comments. The guidelines include specific rules for protection <br />of historic or potentially historic buildings. <br /> <br />Local Market Conditions and Activity <br />The local rental housing market is tight. The low vacancy rate (less than 2% in Eugene and near 0% in the <br />core area), has tended to push rent increases at rates in excess of wage growth. Yet, because of increases in <br />land and construction costs, local rental rates still appear to be insufficient to support new construction of <br />quality infill rental housing in most neighborhoods. West University has recently become an exception in <br />some cases because there is a tolerance for higher rents. However, because rental income is the determining <br />factor for land costs in higher density residential zones, the land costs have been increasing. The non- <br />MUPTE developments have occurred when the land was purchased at much lower than the current market <br />rate of $60.00 per square foot. <br /> <br /> <br />TIMING <br />The program is operating under existing guidelines that remain in place until changed by ordinance. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />Policy Issues and Council Goals <br />The key policy issues are whether the City wishes to provide a tax exemption as a tool that encourages <br />construction of housing in the core area and if so, whether the rules or guidelines should be revised. <br /> <br />Encouraging housing, and higher densities in the core area and in surrounding neighborhoods is consistent <br />with numerous adopted planning and policy documents. Examples include: <br /> <br />Growth Management Policies <br />Policy 1 Support the existing Eugene Urban Growth Boundary by taking actions to increase density <br /> and use on existing vacant land and under-used land within the boundary more efficiently. <br />Policy 2 Encourage in-fill, mixed-use, redevelopment, and higher density development. <br />Policy 3 Encourage a mix of businesses and residential uses downtown using incentives and zoning. <br />Downtown Plan: Living Downtown <br />Policy 1 Stimulate multi-unit housing in the downtown core and on the edges of downtown for a <br /> variety of income levels and ownership opportunities. <br />Policy 2 Reinforce residential use in neighborhoods abutting the downtown commercial core to help <br /> contain commercial activity in downtown and maintain the historic character and livability of <br /> adjacent neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Downtown Plan Implementation Strategies <br />A. Expand the MUPTE program boundary to encourage housing on the edges of downtown. <br /> Periodically review boundaries and expand to include areas where additional housing is appropriate. <br />F. Seek opportunities to equalize the costs of building housing in and near downtown compared <br /> with locations elsewhere in the city. <br /> <br /> Y:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080527\S080527B.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.