My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Minor Code Amendments
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 06/04/08 Work Session
>
Item B: Minor Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:14:07 PM
Creation date
5/30/2008 10:14:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/6/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13. Duplex and Triplex Lots on R-1 The Eugene Code allows a limited percentage of duplex and Table 9.2760 <br />Subdivision Plats triplex lots to be incorporated in subdivisions in the R-1 Low 9.2741(4) <br />Density Residential zone. These lots must be designated as <br />duplex and triplex lots on final subdivision plats and are <br />required to be developed accordingly. This amendment <br />clarifies that duplex and triplex lots can only be created in <br />subdivision plats, not partitions, and clarifies that the <br />designation entitles an owner to develop as duplex or triplex <br />rather than mandates it. (i.e. a single family residence is <br />possible). <br /> <br />14. Provide for Early Neighbor and This amendment would provide affected neighborhood 9.7007 <br />Neighborhood Input into associations and neighbors an opportunity for early input on 9.7010 <br />Development Process significant development proposals, allowing neighbors to raise <br />concerns and issues early in the design process, as opposed to <br />after an application has been submitted. <br /> <br />This amendment would require applicants to host a meeting <br />for surrounding property owners and residents and <br />neighborhood association, prior to the submittal of a <br />significant development proposal (tentative subdivisions and <br />cluster subdivisions over 10 lots or those which include public <br />street improvements, conditional use permits, tentative <br />planned unit developments, refinement plan amendments and <br />metro plan amendments). The purpose of this meeting is to <br />provide a means for the applicant and neighbors to meet to <br />review a development proposal and to share information and <br />concerns regarding the project. <br /> <br />The applicant would be required to host the meeting prior to <br />submitting a land use application, and would be required to <br />submit documentation verifying that proper notice of the <br />meeting was mailed and posted, who attended the meeting and <br />the topics discussed. <br /> <br />This amendment is in alignment with the City Council’s <br />Neighborhood Empowerment Initiative. Specifically, Action <br />Item #11 of the Neighborhood Initiative Action Plan is to <br />“shift involvement of neighborhood associations to be earlier <br />in the land use process.” <br /> <br />15. Final Subdivision and Partition Currently, final subdivision and partition plats are processed Table 9.7055 <br />Plats to follow Type I Process according to the Type II application procedures in response to Table 9.7105 <br />previous case law. This amendment would require final Table 9.7205 <br />subdivision and partition plats to follow the Type I Table 9.7230 <br />Application Procedures, consistent with changes made to state 9.8555 <br />law in 2004. <br /> <br />16. Eliminate Site Review Eugene Code requires site review approval for certain uses or 9.2160 <br />Requirements for Projects with for projects on sites with the /SR Site Review overlay zone. 9.2450 <br />Approved Planned Unit When a planned unit development is also required by the 9.2630 <br />Development code, or proposed by an applicant, an applicant is required to 9.2683 <br />submit both site review and planned unit development 9.2740 <br />applications. Given that a planned unit development involves 9.3310 <br />a more comprehensive review than a site review, this 9.3810 <br />amendment would eliminate the redundant requirement for an 9.3910 <br />approved site review for projects that have an approved 9.8320(16) <br />Summary of Proposed Minor Code Amendments 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.