Ordinance No. 20234 Exhibit C - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(a) The amendment must be consistent with the relevant statewide planning goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission; and (b) Adoption of the amendments must not make the Metro Plan internally in- consistent. The TransPlan update is considered a major plan update under Section 9.138 of the Eugene Code, 1971, and is not subject to the criteria for refinement plan amendments outlined in EC 9.139 through 9.148. The following criteria shall be applied by the elected officials to the adoption of amendments to TransPlan as a refinement plan to the Metro Plan: (a) Consistency with the relevant statewide planning goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission; and (b) Consistency with the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan). Since these approval criteria overlap, the findings in this document are organized as fol- lows: I. findings of consistency of the Metro Plan and TransPlan amendments with the applicable statewide planning goals; II. findings of consi~tency of the Metro Plan and TransPlan amendments with the applicable sections of the Transportation Planning Rule, OAR 660, Division 12; III. findings of consistency of the revised TransPlan with the Metro Plan; and IV. findings that the Metro Plan amendments do hot make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. The following information, analysis, reports, minutes and materials are included along with other material in the record of this proceedings. While this supporting background material may not all be specifically mentioned or referenced in the findings, they provide most of the factual basis for these findings: · Seventy-one documents published by the Lane Council of Governments, Eugene, Springfield, the Lane Transit District or consultants and used as background documents during the preparation of tlie TransPlan update, dated through June 2001, as listed in TransPlan Appendix D. · Minutes and agenda material of the Eugene, Springfield and Lane County plan- ning commissions and Lane County'"Roads Advisory Committee public hearings and work sessions; of the Eugene and Springfield City Councils, Lane County Board of Commissioners and Lane Transit District public hearings and work ses- sions; and of the meetings of the Metropolitan Policy Committee and its Trans- Plan subcommittees. · Indexed public testimony included in the record of the planning commis- Exhibit C Findings in Support of the Adoption of TransPlan 3