Laserfiche WebLink
RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />The majority of the changes proposed in the IGA are related to the need for periodic updates to reflect <br />current operational practices, adopted plans, and metro-wide policy documents. These modifications do <br />not reflect or implement any changes in the relationship or authorities between the governing bodies and <br />the MWMC. The modifications will result in an agreement that is aligned with administrative and <br />operational practices and that is consistent with current regional planning policies and terminologies. <br />Proposed modifications to this end include: <br /> <br />· Update the language to reflect adopted Metro Plan terms and policies. <br />· Update the financing guidance by deleting Exhibit B (which refers to the 1992 Financial Plan, the <br /> County Service District and General Obligation bonding) and replace it with MWMC's 2003 <br /> Financial Plan (including the financial policies and revenue bonding strategy). Move relevant <br /> financial management guidance from Exhibit B into the main body of the IGA. <br />· Change the directive from "compensating" the cities for the regional facilities to "facilitating timely <br /> transfer of ownership," with the same consideration of funding equity among all sewer users that <br /> currently exists. <br />· Eliminate provisions referencing triggers for planning to expand capacity (Section 9 of the IGA), <br /> because the 2004 Facilities Plan and its updates replace the need for this provision. As <br /> recommended, the changes continue the requirement of obtaining Governing Body approval for the <br /> partial and comprehensive facility plan updates that are scheduled at five-year intervals during the <br /> planning period. Also as recommended, the changes allow MWMC to make other relatively minor <br /> revisions to the facility plan, such as the annual updates to the regional CIP, without Governing <br /> Body approval. Notwithstanding these recommended changes to the IGA, however, the governing <br /> bodies will continue their existing role in reviewing such revisions through the annual MWMC <br /> budget adoption process. <br />· Delete the outdated provisions for compensation from the three jurisdictions for "initial expenses." <br />· Move some sections of text for better organization, without modifying intent. <br /> <br />Additional modifications to the IGA are being proposed that reflect the recommendations of MWMC's <br />Financial Advisor. One of the recommended changes, described in the last bullet point below, limits the <br />individual governing bodies' right to adopt regional user rates and systems development charges less <br />than those recommended by the commission in certain situations. The language was recommended by <br />the Financial Advisor to strengthen the assurance that adequate rates and fees will be established to <br />cover long-term borrowing by the commission, and that revenues will be collected and forwarded to <br />MWMC. Adoption of the recommendations is necessary to satisfy the concerns of the bond market and <br />position the MWMC to attract bidders and sell revenue bonds at the lowest cost to the regional sewer <br />customers. Proposed modifications to the IGA in this respect include: <br /> <br />· Incorporate the regional wastewater 2004 Facilities Plan as basis for planning and improving <br /> facilities, and specify that updates that will be submitted for review and approval by the governing <br /> bodies. <br />· Delete the user charge reference to federal regulations (40 CFR 35.929), because previous federal <br /> restrictions under the grants no longer apply, and replace it with language ensuring that sufficient <br /> user charges will be established to meet debt service requirements in addition to operations, <br /> maintenance, etc. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2005 Council Agendas\M050209\S050209B.doc <br /> <br /> <br />