Laserfiche WebLink
<br />success and controversy. Attachments A and B are examples of exclusion ordinances for City Council <br />discussion. Attachment A (version A) provides for exclusion for 90 days if a municipal court judge <br />finds by a preponderance of evidence that a person committed certain offenses within the downtown <br />area. Version A also provides for exclusion for a term of one year upon conviction. Attachment B <br />(version B) is also an exclusion ordinance, but provides only for exclusion upon conviction of the <br />commission of certain offenses within the downtown zone’s boundaries. Both exclusion ordinances <br />empower the Municipal Court to grant excluded persons variances to enter the downtown area for a <br />variety of purposes. <br /> <br />Both the City of Eugene and other communities have successfully utilized exclusion zones in the past. <br />Similar exclusion zones in the City of Portland have survived various legal challenges. The City’s <br />Prostitution Free Zone ordinance virtually eradicated street level prostitution in the West Jefferson and <br />Whiteaker neighborhoods. Park exclusions are used as an effective tool to temporarily forbid certain <br />offenders from remaining in, or returning to, City parks. When the downtown core was a pedestrian <br />mall, the City’s downtown mall exclusion ordinance allowed officers to prohibit repeat offenders from <br />returning to the downtown mall for brief periods of time. Officers considered the ordinance to be an <br />effective method for reducing crime. <br /> <br />Exclusion zones create an increased sense of safety for community members who live and work in the <br />designated zone. For example, park exclusions provide officers with an alternative to incarceration that <br />displaces chronic violators, creating a greater sense of safety in our parks and playgrounds. The civil <br />penalty of exclusion is designed to hold offenders accountable for their actions, to remove offenders <br />from unhealthy environments and to break the cycle of criminal and offensive behavior. The absence of <br />repeat offenders from the designated zone can improve commerce and encourage a more welcoming <br />environment for visitors and residents of the area. On the other hand, the use of exclusion zones curtails <br />the freedom of an excluded person to move about within the exclusion zone. <br /> <br />The exclusion ordinances before the City Council at this work session, like the prostitution exclusion <br />ordinance and the downtown mall exclusion ordinance, allow excluded persons to apply for variances to <br />enter the zone for certain specific purposes (for example, to access social services within the zone). <br />Both the prostitution exclusion ordinance and the downtown mall exclusion ordinance were applied in <br />some measure to members of vulnerable populations who accessed social services located within the <br />exclusion zones. Allowing subjects excluded by ordinance into the zone for important services was <br />occasionally challenging. The City received complaints that exclusions were not consistently applied, <br />leading to some perception of disparate enforcement. <br /> <br />. <br />The critical component of an effective exclusion zone is a consistent police presence To be effective, <br />the same police officers, familiar with chronic offenders, need to be assigned persistently to the same <br />area. Individuals excluded from the zone are more likely to honor the restrictions imposed on them <br />when they believe consequences are reliable and predictable. <br /> <br />Enhanced Penalty Zone <br />EPD also considered an ordinance to enhance penalties for certain crimes committed within the <br />downtown public safety zone but ultimately concluded, based in part on advice from the Municipal <br />Court, that any deterrent effect would be outweighed by the costs of administration and enforcement. <br /> <br /> <br /> Z:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080609\S080609B.doc <br /> <br />