My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C: General Obligation Bonds for Street Maintenance
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 06/09/08 Work Session
>
Item C: General Obligation Bonds for Street Maintenance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:18:55 PM
Creation date
6/6/2008 9:34:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/9/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SCOPE <br />Eugene’s street system is an extensive network of various types of traveling surfaces under <br />the City’s jurisdiction. In the following report, definitions of pavement types, improvement <br />status, and functional classifications are provided and categorized in terms of both centerline <br />mileage and 12’ wide lane miles. <br />A brief history and description of the Pavement Management System (PMS) used by the City <br />will be discussed. Components of PMS, such as pavement inspection frequency, pavement <br />conditions which are described by the Overall Condition Index (OCI), and reports produced <br />by PMS are addressed. <br />Highlighted in the report is the Pavement Preservation Program (PPP) which began in 2003. <br />Outlined are the typical types of preservation treatments, the current lane mile unit cost for <br />each treatment, what condition or OCI a project is recommended for preservation, and a <br />current treatment needs cost analysis is given. A table is provided detailing the current <br />funding sources for PPP. <br />For an effective preservation program, a coordinated effort is required by the Maintenance <br />and Engineering Divisions, therefore both roles are discussed later in the report. Preservation <br />project selection, interim maintenance prioritization, and ultimately project construction or <br />deferral for future reconstruction is discussed in additional detail. This report lists and maps a <br />one year proposed project list in addition to projects completed to date. <br />Three funding scenarios are explored through the analysis program in PMS. We look at the <br />current funding, an $18 million funding, and a scenario where all reconstruct projects are <br />rehabilitated. It is important to note the analysis routines are set up for a 10-year projection, <br />and at this time they are formatted for improved asphalt streets only. These analyses provide <br />necessary information regarding condition trends and rehabilitation needs. Utilizing current <br />funding the analysis gives an idea if our street system remains in the present level of <br />serviceability or is declining. Also, what funding level will create an improvement in our <br />street system and reduce the $173 million backlog. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.