My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCMinutes - 12/06/04 Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2004
>
CCMinutes - 12/06/04 Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:29:22 AM
Creation date
2/7/2005 11:13:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Springfield. He said Eugene streets were built for a 15-year life, using T-99, while Springfield used the T- <br />180 process which provided a 20-year life. He related that he spoke with a City of Eugene engineer and the <br />engineer indicated he did not know why the T-99 process was being employed. He opposed "throwing <br />money" into building streets for the shorter term. He suggested the City use concrete, which provided streets <br />with a 50-year life. He admonished the City to fix the streets properly. <br /> <br />Murphy McHugh, 1848 Russet Drive, explained that he was a gasoline station owner. He related that the <br />last gas tax caused him to lose 10 to 15 percent of his business, which resulted in loss of employment and <br />reductions in hours for his employees. He pointed out that many people from rural communities came to the <br />City of Eugene to shop and would fill their gas tanks up prior to leaving. He predicted the increase in gas <br />tax would force those people to purchase gasoline in Springfield and other communities. He suggested <br />charging. 1 percent to all of the businesses in Eugene, rather than singling out the gas stations. He projected <br />that another increase in the gas tax would force him to let another employee go. <br /> <br />Jozef Zdzienicki, 1025 Taylor Street, submitted a letter of testimony from his "mate." He provided three <br />examples of alleged misuse of public money for council consideration, as follows: <br /> 1) In July 2002, four Public Works employees poured 100 square feet of concrete for four <br /> hours for the owner of the Chambers house. He shared that he and his boss had poured 600 <br /> square feet of slab with two sets of stairs in it on that same day. <br /> 2) In September, 2002, while relandscaping a yard at 23rd Avenue and Agate Street, two <br /> employees of the Division of Parks and Open Space would visit for 45-minutes and then <br /> would utilize leaf blowers for 10 minutes at the park across the street. He witnessed this <br /> twice a week for the three and a half weeks he worked on the landscaping project. <br /> 3) In February 2004, nine Public Works employees with seven vehicles poured 60 feet of <br /> sidewalk near East Amazon Street and were present for an entire morning. <br />He asked the council to "set its house in order" prior to taxing the public more. <br /> <br />Aaron Johnson, 2672 Canterbury Street, opined that a government that stopped working for its people was <br />no longer a government for the people but a government that "enslaved its people" for its own benefit and <br />growth. He felt the City continued to ask for money though people keep saying no to taxes. He said, as a <br />manager, he was bound by a budget and the City should be, too. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson stated that only three independent gas stations were left. He related that he employed 22 people <br />in 2003, but had to lay off three in 2004. Should the ordinance be approved, he predicted he would be <br />forced to lay off more employees. He opined that excessive fees were killing the small station operators. He <br />felt the City provided tax breaks to developers for a "failed downtown" and managed to find $28 million to <br />be spent on a police station. He said the current taxes took $300 per day from his business. He felt this <br />drove 10 percent of his business away. He agreed the fee had a "noble cause" attached to it, but opined it <br />would be a burden that would result in the death of unskilled jobs. <br /> <br />Steve O'Toole, 7070 Southwest Fir Loop, Suite 150, Tigard, executive director of the Petroleum <br />Association of Oregon, primarily representing small, independent Oregon businesses involved in commercial <br />and retail petroleum sales, conveyed the organization's opposition to the gas taxes. He stated that the <br />association would support an equitable system on the State level that would provide continuous jurisdiction <br />between local entities. He underscored that local competitive factors affected the purchasing habits of the <br />motoring public. He predicted that Eugene drivers would go elsewhere to purchase gasoline should the <br />ordinance be passed and would hurt not only the local gasoline proprietors, but the city and its residents. He <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 6, 2004 Page 10 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.