Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ATTACHMENT E <br />Mr. Carroll preferred to recommend option A to the Council to allow for further analysis by the ICS Task <br />Team. <br /> <br />Mr. Lawless agreed with Mr. Carroll. <br /> <br />Mr. Hledik preferred option D and forwarding the issue to the ICS Task Team and use of the <br />neighborhood proposal if the Council did not want to forward it to ICS. <br /> <br />Mr. Duncan stated the University of Oregon (UO) was generating increased enrollment, and needed to <br />participate in developing a solution. This was not a minor code amendment and needed to be a major <br />project for the Planning Commission. The proposed ordinance was not a good fix for the problem. <br /> <br />Ms. Kneeland preferred option D and forwarding the issue to the ICS Task Team. <br /> <br />Ms. Beierle was interested in looking at a dialogue between the neighborhood and the UO as a component <br />to addresses the issue. She recommended getting more information that would come from that dialogue. <br />The neighborhoods needed to have an empowered role in the community. <br /> <br />Mr. Carroll agreed the UO was a player with this subject. He added the issue was really the number of <br />dwelling units and the number of bedrooms. Automobile ownership and demand was not unique to <br />students. He preferred option A over option D because the City needed to take a broad look at minimum <br />parking standards and requirements in general, rather than simply tweaking numbers. <br /> <br />Mr. Hledik, seconded by Mr. McCown, moved that the Planning Commission <br />recommend option D for Amendment 7 – Required Parking for Multi-Family <br />Developments in West University and South University Neighborhood <br />Associations, that the City Council not adopt the proposed amendment at this <br />time and defer the topic to the Infill Compatibility Standards project for further <br />consideration to allow for a more comprehensive review and analysis of the <br />issues and policy choices, as well as identification of long term solutions. <br />However, in the event the City Council decides to adopt an amendment related to <br />this topic, the Planning Commission would recommend the ordinance following <br />the West University revised parking plan. <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene Planning Commission June 2, 2008 Page 12 <br /> <br />