Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Poling, seconded by Mr. Papd, moved to extend the discussion by ten <br /> minutes. The motion passed, 5:3; Mr. Kelly, Ms. Bettman, and Ms. Taylor <br /> voting no. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling thanked everyone who was involved in developing the plan. He noted that he was particularly <br />concerned with the areas of the City that were underserved by parks, such as his and Mr. Pap6's wards. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon thanked the committee and Ms. Nathanson. She stated that while she was not opposed to the <br />acquisition of park lands, it was important to remember that when land was taken from the private sector <br />and placed into the public sector, the property tax revenue from the land was lost. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner remarked that, though his education and career included graduate degrees in Law and Library <br />Science and involved planning, he sometimes hated plans. He observed that the City of Eugene did a lot of <br />planning but not a lot of doing. He hoped this plan would not be relegated to a shelf. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said he was happy to see maintenance costs included. He hoped that the City Manager would <br />look at the artificial division between Parks and Open Space and Recreation at some point. As an example, <br />he commented that it was never clear who to talk to in regard to the Washington/Jefferson Park because of <br />that division. <br /> <br />Additionally, Mr. Meisner hoped attention would be paid to this document and its planning and other <br />elements such as the Goal 5 study and stormwater acquisition for stream corridors. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey reiterated the council's gratitude for the work done to create the draft. He underscored the <br />necessity of partnerships to bring the plan to fruition and suggested such partners could include school <br />districts, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and the United Front lobbying effort. He noted that the <br />City had been able to expand its ability to provide services as a result of what it had done with the Bethel <br />and 4J School Districts. He pointed out the partnerships that had been forged in the creation of the West <br />Eugene Wetlands Project. He underscored the importance of getting the Rachel Carson Education Center in <br />a funding pattern when members of the City Council went to Washington, DC, as part of the United Front <br />lobby, as it was a park-like setting, tourist and education-oriented, and a place where a person who was not <br />necessarily activity-oriented would feel welcome. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said, from an efficiency standpoint, it was important to look at such things as all-weather <br />surface facilities. He stressed that such facilities at the high schools offered the opportunity to get 2-1/2 <br />times more use than a grass field because of how affected the latter was by the weather. He called attention <br />to the fact that the City was going to lose seven full-sized soccer fields by the end of March 2005. He <br />expressed concern that there would be no place for local youth to play soccer. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ concurred. Noting he was surprised that the planned area took in land outside of the UGB, Mr. <br />Pap~ asked how this was to be accomplished. Ms. Riner replied that such parks were included as a result of <br />the Rivers to Ridges recommendations, which had been approved by all of the jurisdictions. <br /> <br />E. WORK SESSION AND ACTION: Draft Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program <br /> Project List <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Poling, moved to approve the Eugene's pro- <br /> ject list in the draft FY2005-2007 Metropolitan Transportation Improve- <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 8, 2004 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />