My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 06/23/08 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:29:09 PM
Creation date
6/20/2008 10:15:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/23/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
what was said, if enforcement of the rules for driving was not important, Eugene could not call itself a <br />progressive place. He opined that the automobile ruled in Eugene. <br /> <br />Gordon Anslow <br />, 4493 Paddock Drive, spoke in support of approval of the Multiple Unit Property Tax <br />th <br />Exemption (MUPTE) for the property located at 450 East 14 Avenue, the eighth item on the City Council <br />agenda. He said he had lived in Eugene since 1976 and was currently co-chair of the Infill Compatibility <br />Standards Task Team. He noted that he had previously served on the TransPlan Advisory Committee and <br />had more recently worked on the Walnut Station mixed use area planning effort, among others. He held <br />former Governor Tom McCall as a personal hero for his pivotal role for establishing Oregon’s “justly <br />famous and widely respected” statewide land use laws. He believed that the urban infill projects were an <br />appropriate step in an effort to preserve farm and forest lands. He averred that in the current “post-peak oil <br />era” projects that provided decent housing close to school, work, and shopping were needed to limit local <br />dependence on oil-intensive transportation. He said good urban planning had a role in limiting environ- <br />mental impact. He commended Mr. Hansen, calling him “exactly the sort of customer we like to see.” He <br />felt Mr. Hansen valued good design and was sympathetic to efforts to build economically viable projects that <br />could still be considered compatible with the neighborhood. He stressed his company’s emphasis on <br />building projects that were in line with the older houses that remained in the neighborhood. He pointed out <br />that though it would have made economic sense to raze the existing structure to build more units and <br />establish more parking, they had decided to retain and upgrade the original house and build new units behind <br />it. He stated that the West University Neighbors (WUN) had conveyed their unanimous support for the <br />project. He related that they had proposed considerable additional landscaping and a number of new trees. <br />He said it would provide 15 parking spaces though the requirement was for six and security would be built <br />into the building. He asserted that the tax relief provided by the MUPTE allowed the project to be more <br />responsive to neighborhood concerns and to provide a higher level of architectural quality. He urged the <br />council to support the MUPTE application. He provided his testimony in writing. <br /> <br />Zachary Vishanoff <br />, somewhere on Patterson Street, provided a handout. He believed that the street <br />maintenance backlog had arisen from projects that qualified for a MUPTE. He declared that the density the <br />projects provided had worn out the streets. He opined that a lot of deforestation had been brought about by <br />MUPTE projects as well. He also opposed allowing the rents to increase for the apartments that Mr. <br />Weiner had spoken about. <br /> <br />Mr. Vishanoff commended Mayor Piercy, calling her a “great candidate for Mayor.” He was pleased that <br />she had been willing to start a conversation about the Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) property. <br />He thought whatever happened at the EWEB property would benefit from the public conversation. <br /> <br />Mr. Vishanoff asked the council to Google an article called U of O Seeks Fast Track for Builder of Arena. <br />He predicted the State Board of Education would “rubber stamp” the application and this would allow them <br />to go with their “good old boy forums” that were involved with problematic projects, lawsuits, accidents, <br />and “boondoggles” around the world. <br /> <br />Dean Hansen <br />, 2917 Powderhorn Street, wanted to speak in favor of the application for a MUPTE that he <br />th <br />had submitted for 450 East 14 Avenue. He noted that he had lived in Eugene for more than 35 years and <br />had worked at a bank and his wife taught at Lane Community College. He underscored how much he cared <br />for his community, adding that he had served for ten years on the Fair Board, was currently on the United <br />Way Board, had served on the Kidsports Board for over 20 years, and currently sat on the Lane Community <br />College Foundation Board of Directors. He shared that he had been “pleased and excited” when the WUN <br />had unanimously approved the recommendation for his application for a MUPTE. He related that the WUN <br />had liked the fact that the project had many sustainability features and included ample parking. He <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 14, 2008 Page 3 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.