Laserfiche WebLink
recommendation was to keep the minimum width at five feet as it was considered a comfortable width for <br />two pedestrians to walk side by side. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman indicated she would support the motion. She said it would not mandate four-foot <br />sidewalks in the area; it would leave discretion to reduce width in places that would need it. She asserted <br />th <br />that sidewalks were not an adequate width in a project on 29 Avenue and asked how that had been allowed. <br />Mr. Schoening replied that he was not familiar with that project. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka asked why the Crest Drive Neighbors had wanted four-foot sidewalk widths if the <br />existing codes allowed for a five-foot sidewalk to be narrower where it was necessary. Mr. Schoening <br />responded that there was not a width to the sidewalk in the recommended design at present. He believed that <br />the community wanted a design standard that was less than five feet because an exception to the current <br />code could only be granted based on one of the five exception criteria: topography, historic resources, <br />wetlands, trees, and inadequate right-of-way. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka surmised that the sidewalk would double as a bicycle path. Mr. Schoening affirmed that <br />it could. Councilor Zelenka thought a four foot wide sidewalk would make it difficult for a bicycle to pass a <br />pedestrian. Mr. Schoening agreed, adding that it would be difficult on a five foot wide sidewalk as well. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion passed, 5:2; councilors Zelenka and Solomon voting in opposi- <br />tion. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Bettman, moved to direct the City Manager to (1) <br />request the Planning Commission to approve classifying Friendly Street, Crest Drive and <br />Storey Boulevard as local streets, and (2) if the Planning Commission approves that classi- <br />fication, to bring the council an ordinance adopting that classification. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka offered a friendly amendment to substitute the word ‘investigate’ for the <br />word ‘approve.’ The motion maker and the second accepted the friendly amendment. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, as amended, 7:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to take from the table Consent <br />Calendar Item E. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion to approve Consent Calendar Item E, adoption of Resolution <br />4937 authorizing interim and long term financing for Local improvement Projects and ter- <br />minating the authority under Resolution No. 4807, passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor asked how and when the council could talk about assessments and, in particular, for the <br />CDCT project. Mayor Piercy responded that she should request a work session. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 14, 2008 Page 12 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />