Laserfiche WebLink
arose from students living on their own with few rules other than those imposed by the legal code. <br />Neighbors would have to request police enforcement of conduct issues, and she did not think that was fair. <br />She also did not think it was fair to students as they would be surrounded by people in very different stages <br />of life. She said if the development went up and housed college students, it would be a dorm. She likened it <br />to Chase Village, which was known as the sophomore dorms and was notorious for police activity. She <br />envisioned the development would change the neighborhood for the worse as the environment it would create <br />was not good for families. She did not want to see her neighborhood changed into a transitional zone by her <br />peers. <br /> <br />th <br />Gary Craiger <br />, 856 East 19 Avenue, spoke nostalgically of when he had moved into the neighborhood. He <br />had been surprised to learn of the development and said he would prefer to see the sky rather than the <br />structure proposed, which would change his world in ways he could not imagine. He questioned how the <br />building could be considered compatible infill and asked if the structure would be allowed to start an <br />invasion of high rise structures from Alder to Agate streets. He requested council assistance and support. <br /> <br />Tim Herman <br />, 1965 Alder Street, spoke of his experience living in a neighborhood close to campus and <br />characterized it as a wonderful place to live. He questioned how the proposed development made sense. He <br />thought transitional planning was lacking. He said residents favored density and residential infill but the <br />proposal did not make sense. He would welcome a shorter building as the proposed building did not seem <br />compatible with the neighborhood. He said it “reeked of greed” and asked the council to place a moratorium <br />on it until the ICS Task Team completed its work. <br /> <br />Paul Moore <br />, 2586 Potter Street, advocated for the inclusion of bicycle paths in the Crest Drive street <br />improvement project. He said without such paths, the system would be incomplete. He addressed testimony <br />offered against such paths, saying there was a need for paths in the area, a Eugene Bicycle Coalition <br />representative participated in the process but did not support the final design, and there was no compromise <br />in regard to the overarching value of narrow streets. He said information disseminated by the City had once <br />mentioned bicycle paths but no longer did, even where there was overwhelming sentiment at the open house <br />for bicycle paths. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the Public Forum and noted the council work session on the development in question <br />was scheduled for March 10. She called for council comments and questions. <br /> <br />Councilor Pyror thanked those who attended the meeting and indicated that as the council’s representative to <br />the LCOG board, he had additional information to share. The speakers were correct in that Lane County <br />had taken over population projections. LCOG had official authority and were it to act on Eugene’s <br />population figures, they would have been brought to the council for approval. He said the Eugene <br />population forecast figures included in the LCOG projections were population figures already approved by <br />the council in 2005 and had been increased by a standard demographic population figure. The LCOG <br />figures have no official standing, so LCOG would move them on to the Lane County Board of County <br />Commissioners with a recommendation to use them if the board chose to do so. Councilor Pyror said some <br />of the Lane County municipalities chose to have their population figures adopted, and every jurisdiction was <br />approving its own population figures, not the figures in total. He advised the council against being drawn <br />into a very contentious disagreement involving communities such as Lowell. Those communities needed to <br />work out their issues on their own. <br />. <br />Councilor Clark thanked those who testified about the proposed development in south Eugene. He spoke to <br />the concerns expressed by Mr. Price, and said that Ron Farmer and other commissioners had asked that the <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 25, 2008 Page 3 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />