Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT D <br /> <br /> MINUTES <br /> <br /> Eugene City Council <br /> Regular Session <br /> Council Chamber--City Hall <br /> <br /> January 24, 2005 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: George Poling, David Kelly, Betty Taylor, Jennifer Solomon, Chris <br /> Pryor, Andrea Ortiz, Bonny Bettman, Gary Pap6. <br /> <br />Mayor Kitty Piercy called the meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. <br /> <br />1. PUBLIC FORUM <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy reviewed the rules of the Public Forum. <br /> <br /> Councilor Poling, seconded by Councilor Solomon, moved to allow all 13 <br /> people who had submitted request to speak forms the time to speak. Roll <br /> call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Roxie Cuellar, 2053 Laura Street, spoke on behalf of the Lane County Home Builders Association <br />(LCHBA). She thanked both the City Manager and the City Council for agreeing to hold a work session <br />on the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC) Intergovernmental Agreement <br />(IGA). She related that the LCHBA took issue with two elements of the IGA: 1) that wastewater systems <br />development charges (SDCs) would be set by the MWMC instead of by the elected officials; and 2) the <br />facilities plan which the HBA was appealing to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) based on its <br />contention that this was a land use action. She stated that the LCHBA's concern was that the MWMC <br />could just make project changes on the facilities plan without consulting the elected officials. <br /> <br />Ellen Ityman, 3863 Dorchester Lane, welcomed the new councilors and mayor. She said the members of <br />the Santa Clara Committee for Sensible Parks and Open Spaces (SCCSPOS) had put together their own <br />questionnaire that went out to homes in the 97404 zip code area. She related that the committee decided <br />to take this on because they had heard that the City was going to conduct a telephone survey of 400 <br />households in Eugene. The committee did not know how well-informed those to be called would be and <br />also what questions would be asked. She acknowledged that the City's survey might be more statistically <br />scientific, but asserted it would not come close to addressing the heart of the issue, which was the land <br />exchange. She said the issue for the neighborhood was whether or not the Santa Clara residents were <br />willing to accept a deal that allegedly only benefited a private developer and the City coffers. Ms. Hyman <br />felt moving the urban growth boundary (UGB) to benefit one land owner set a dangerous precedent. She <br />opined that nothing about this deal was in the best interest of Santa Clara citizens and predicted the <br />committee's questionnaire would give the residents a real voice in this process. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hyman announced that the Santa Clara Community Organization was holding an informational <br /> meeting scheduled for February 3, 2005, at the Santa Clara Grange, to which everyone was invited. Based <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 24, 2005 Page 1 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />