My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A - Minutes Approval
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 02/14/05 Mtg
>
Item 2A - Minutes Approval
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:23:46 PM
Creation date
2/10/2005 10:16:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/14/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Kevin Franken, 2646 Gay Street, strongly supported amending the ordinance to maintain 25 feet between <br />smoking areas and public buildings, including windows and air intakes. He related that he was very <br />allergic to cigarette smoke and this had caused him a great deal of discomfort while attending the <br />University of Oregon Law School. He said many times he had been forced to walk around to other exits <br />because of congregating cigarette smokers by the doors. He noted a previous speaker had said that <br />cigarette smoke did not know how to stay in the smoking section and shared the following quote, which he <br />had found on the internet: "Having a smoking section in a workplace is like having a peeing section in a <br />swimming pool." He stressed that cigarettes were the only product that, when used as directed, would kill <br />a person. He pointed out that entertainer Johnny Carson had just died from emphysema related to <br />cigarette smoking. <br /> <br />Julia Martin, 1013 Tiara Street, thanked the council for passing "this important piece of public health <br />legislation" in 2000. She wished to thank the council in particular for protecting those who were most <br />exposed, those working in restaurants and bars. She stated that when the laws were passed there were <br />only 16 cities, including Corvallis, with comprehensive smoke-free indoor workplace laws. She said since <br />those laws were passed, 80 more municipalities had passed such laws. She related that, in spite of efforts <br />by the tobacco industry, the States of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Massachusetts, New York, and <br />California had passed laws making indoor workplaces smoke-free. She noted that Ireland, Norway, and <br />New Zealand had also passed such laws and countries such as Great Britain and Italy were in the process <br />of enacting smoke-free laws. She noted that regulations in dozens of communities made smoking in parks <br />and on playgrounds off limits. She supported the expansion of the ordinance language and echoed the <br />opposition of previous speakers to the incorporation of the administrative rule regarding outdoor smoking <br />areas into the code. <br /> <br />Susan Planner, 1788 Riverview Street, worked as a respiratory therapist. She explained that her job <br />focused primarily on providing therapy for people with chronic breathing problems. She related that many <br />of the people that she treated had tobacco-related diseases. She was grateful to the council for passing the <br />ordinance in 2000, stating that it had improved work places for many citizens. She commented that she <br />had been a volunteer for the American Lung Association and had heard people speak of how wonderful it <br />was to be able to go to smoke-free clubs and how wonderful it was for oxygen-assisted people to go out <br />without the worry of having a combustible gas around smoking. <br /> <br />Ms. Pfanner felt, however, that the second portion of the proposed ordinance was a step in the wrong <br />direction. She declared smoke-free legislation to be the trend of the future. She said she was proud to be <br />from a City that was in the forefront of such legislation. <br /> <br />Grant Itigginson, 800 Northeast Oregon Street, Portland, stated that he was the State Public Health <br />Officer with Department for Health and Human Services (DHHS). He said he performed a number of <br />roles, one of which was to monitor the enforcement of Oregon's Indoor Clean Act, passed in 2001 that <br />prevented all indoor smoking with the exception of smoking sections in bars and all bingo halls. He <br />complimented the City of Eugene on its progressive ordinance. However, he expressed concern that the <br />language regarding outdoor smoking areas in the proposed ordinance could violate both the spirit and the <br />letter of the law. He thought structures could be constructed that would be completely legal in the city of <br />Eugene but would be in conflict with State law. He wished to avoid a situation wherein businesses <br />believed they were constructing perfectly legal outdoor smoking structures only to be sanctioned for them <br />once they were completed. He stated that there was no research that a 25-percent open plane surface <br />structure had a significant effect in reducing the problems seen with second-hand smoke. He was also <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 24, 2005 Page 9 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.