My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 04/14/08 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2008
>
CC Minutes - 04/14/08 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:28:09 AM
Creation date
6/30/2008 3:02:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/14/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Solomon expressed concern that the council had no backup plan if the Riverfront site could not be <br />successfully negotiated by the end of May. She feared the hospital would be lost to Springfield. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said she would not support the motion with the inclusion of options 2 and 3, which would devote <br />staff time to the two North Eugene sites. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor felt that options 2 and 3 represented a backup plan that could be pursued if there was no decision on <br />the Riverfront site by the end of May. <br /> <br />Ms. Jones added that staff would also be exploring other sites within the City and would work on any that <br />appeared to meet the hospital’s needs, in addition to the sites included in the council’s discussion. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz urged unanimous council support for a site because the hospital needed to be certain of support for <br />its move to Eugene. She would support the motion as it included all of the options and hoped councilors would <br />support the other sites if the Riverfront site was eliminated. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said her intent was to be inclusionary and her first priority was to have a full service medical <br />facility available to the highest concentration of population in Lane County, which was the South Eugene area. <br />She said if it came to a choice of life-saving services south of the river or not in Eugene, she would support <br />south of the river. She said it was not as important to have the hospital in Eugene as it was to have it <br />accessible to the concentration of population. <br /> <br />th <br />Ms. Piercy reminded the council that the 12 Avenue and Willamette Street site was also a possibility. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark noted there were sites in Springfield north of the river and hoped the council’s action would not <br />result in driving the hospital north of the river, which would be the worst scenario from the City of Eugene’s <br />perspective. <br /> <br />The motion to substitute, as amended, passed, 5:2; Ms. Taylor and Ms. Solomon vot- <br />ing in opposition. <br /> <br />The substitute main motion passed, 5:2; Ms. Taylor and Ms. Solomon voting in op- <br />position. <br /> <br /> <br />C. WORK SESSION: Downtown Public Safety Issues <br /> <br />Ms. Jones introduced Police Chief Bob Lehner to discuss the issue of downtown public safety. <br /> <br />Chief Lehner said the concerns about downtown public safety resulted from policing issues related to <br />disorderly behavior. He said the Eugene Police Department (EPD) was asked to develop short-term and long- <br />term strategies for addressing those problems. He said the Special Program to deploy foot and bike patrols in <br />downtown was intended to provide overtime based resources for two officers for one 10-hour shift seven days <br />per week from April through October. He said a focused response to a situation involving a particular <br />downtown business owner had addressed the problem while in effect, but it was not sustainable from a staff <br />resources perspective. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 14, 2008 Page 6 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.