Laserfiche WebLink
Gerry Gaydos <br />, 440 East Broadway, Suite 300, spoke in regard to Agenda Item 5, regarding the recom- <br />mended design for Crest Drive, Storey Boulevard, and Friendly Street. He commended the process that had <br />brought the design recommendation forward. He underscored that the overall issue was what was best for <br />the City, which would be decided by the council. He asked the council to consider the issues regarding <br />bicycling and safety as well as the need to maintain the rural character, which meant that some people still <br />had larger vehicles such as tractors and recreational vehicles. He pointed out that if access were taken away <br />from someone it constituted a taking. He agreed there should be a compromise between City standards, <br />design, and safety. He thought this might be best served by having the narrow roads that had been <br />approved. He felt that if the City went further and required diverters and traffic calming elements it would <br />cause area residents concern. There were many difficult intersections in the area. He underscored the need <br />to accommodate emergency vehicles. <br /> <br />Lyndell Wilken <br />, 3065 Whitbeck Boulevard, stated that she had served as the bicycle/pedestrian representa- <br />tive for the Crest Drive Community Team (CDCT). She said everyone in the process regardless of their <br />position felt passionately about the design for which they advocated. She felt no one could be faulted. She <br />expressed disappointment in the design as presented because she did not believe it provided safe passage for <br />bicycles. She related that many in the bicycling community wanted the full five-foot wide lane. She <br />disagreed with the design and could not vouch for its safety. <br /> <br />th <br />Marilyn Milne <br />, 2156 Harris Street, spoke regarding the proposed building project on the corner of 19 <br />Avenue and Alder Street. She thanked Councilor Zelenka on behalf of the neighborhood for “caring about <br />the livability” of the neighborhood. She related that the neighborhood residents had met with the developer <br />of the apartment building. She felt he was concerned and said he was now looking at ways to lessen the <br />impact of the building on the neighborhood. She noted that the neighborhood had representatives on the <br />Infill Compatibility Siting Task Force (ICS) and several members were serving on ICS subcommittees. <br /> <br />Ms. Milne stated that many South University Neighborhood Association (SUNA) residents attended the <br />Planning Commission’s recent Minor Code Amendment Process (MiCAP) meeting. She related that they <br />had been disappointed in the planners’ recommendation for “an extremely limited” transition zone between <br />th <br />land zoned R-3 and R-1 on the south side of 19 Avenue. She said one resident had offered suggestions for <br />how to improve the proposal. She averred that current code in the ICS directives did not define density so <br />that it recognized all forms. She cited, as an example, conversion of a residence into a home for five to eight <br />non-related people. She said another MiCAP proposal concerned parking. She felt it would help to have <br />ICS explore parking requirements for R-3 and R-4 developments. She added that they wanted the area <br />thth <br />between 18 and 20 Avenues and Agate and Hilyard Streets to be an ICS test case. She asked the council <br />to “remind City staff to follow through on these directives.” <br /> <br />th <br />Victor Stathakis <br />, 935 West 8 Avenue, chair of the Wayne Morse Youth Program, stated that the free <br />th <br />speech terrace was operating again for its 16 year with the advent of the first Saturday Market of the year. <br />He invited the councilors to see Mr. Morse’s legacy in action, which he wanted to pass on to young in <br />particular. He called it a tough venue. He said they were proud of the Saturday Market and the Farmers <br />Market; they had “three great corners.” He related that the fourth corner, however, featured a “disparate <br />bunch of groups.” He invited the City to tap into its expertise on how to better coordinate this area. He <br />noted that they were working well with the County Commissioners but they needed help from the Eugene <br />Police Department (EPD). He remarked that it was not numbers so much as the quality of policing. He <br />averred that they needed “Officer Friendly” who knew the people there and could discern between those who <br />were bad and those who were good. He asked to sit down with representatives of the EPD to talk about the <br />possibility of making the area someone’s beat. He wanted to improve the fourth corner. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 14, 2008 Page 5 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />