My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 07/14/08 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:27:26 PM
Creation date
7/11/2008 10:26:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/14/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
required to certify a “mold infested” area. He said mold was an ill-defined event; some people were allergic <br />to it and others were not. He said most problems with mold in houses and buildings related to moisture <br />penetration and entrapment and dealing with it was an active, not passive event; an annual inspection would <br />not prevent mold. He pointed out that the Center for Disease Control found no toxic mold; that was a term <br />developed by the tort industry. He urged the council not to expand the ordinance to include mold. <br /> <br />nd <br />Sam Dotters-Katz <br />, West 22 Avenue, Eugene, president-elect of the Associated Students of the University <br />of Oregon (ASUO), endorsed adoption of the ordinance changes that would augment Eugene’s rental <br />housing standards. He understood there were state statutes in place related to some of those standards, but <br />recourse through court proceedings was too time-consuming and expensive for the two large groups—low <br />income renters and students living off campus. He said it was an access issue and not related to changing <br />the rights of renters; only making their options for recourse more accessible and usable. <br /> <br />th <br />Tom Bode <br />, East 18 Avenue, Eugene, said he was a University of Oregon students and renter who had <br />mold in his unit. He followed the guidelines for using a fan and keeping the apartment warm, but his <br />landlord ignored the mold problem. He supported adding mold to the rental housing standards as it <br />represented a threat to the health of renters and renters alone should not bear the responsibility for <br />prevention and remediation of mold. He said researched demonstrated that mold in the home could be a <br />serious health threat, causing allergic reactions and irritating lungs; some mold created microtoxins, which <br />caused illness and death. He said moisture caused mold and cleaning it up without addressing the <br />underlying problem was only a temporary solution. Proper preventative measures could require significant <br />structural changes to housing units for which renters lacked the expertise, resources and permission to <br />perform; they were best undertaken by landlords. He asserted that there were federal guidelines asserting <br />that mold cleanup could be dangerous. He urged the council to include mold in the housing standards as a <br />necessity, not a luxury for rentals. <br /> <br />Hilary Jones <br />, University Street, Eugene, a University of Oregon student and renter, related her personal <br />experience with mold in her housing unit to illustrate the need to include mold in the ordinance. She asked <br />the council to adopt the ordinance to improve Eugene’s rental housing standards. <br /> <br />Kari Herinckx, <br />Kinsrow Avenue, Eugene, a University of Oregon student, thanked the council for giving <br />students the opportunity to address the need to continue the work started four years ago when students <br />fought for Eugene rental housing standards. She said students represented the needs of all renters. She said <br />the three items being added to the ordinance—mold, security and lack of smoke detectors—reflected the top <br />three complaints from renters. She said those issues represented tangible threats to the health and security of <br />renters, who composed almost half of the City’s population, and passing the ordinance would assure a better <br />standard of living. <br /> <br />Paul Cauthorn <br />, Baker Boulevard, Eugene, remarked that landlords provided a service to the community by <br />making quality housing available at a reasonable fee. Tenants were also provided appliances and an on-call <br />handyman when needed. He said tenants had full protection of their rights under State law that included <br />many things the ineffective, redundant City housing program did not. He said staff was advocating for <br />expansion of the program even though it had assisted few people and caused many evictions. He pointed out <br />that Eugene was hosting the Olympic Trials next month and yet roads were <br />deteriorating and public buildings in disrepair. He said the council had failed the citizens and urged it to <br />stop chastising small businesses and correct its own mistakes. <br /> <br />Patti Lundeen <br />, Lusk Road, Eugene, spoke on behalf of Metro Multi-Family Housing Association, <br />representing many members in the Eugene area. She said the association provided education on mold and <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council May 19, 2008 Page 7 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.