My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 07/14/08 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:27:26 PM
Creation date
7/11/2008 10:26:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/14/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Poling had three questions that staff could respond to in memorandum form prior to the <br />public hearing. Referring to the 70 percent of developments built without MUPTE cited by Mr. <br />Zelenka, Mr. Poling asked how many projects had been applied for and denied, but built anyway? <br />Of the 30 percent that were built with MUPTE, how many would not have been built without <br />MUPTE? How many applications were submitted, turned down and nothing was built? <br /> <br />Mr. Clark asked of those that were turned down, how were the plans substantively altered in <br />terms of what was actually built before being built without MUPTE? <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked for clarification in memorandum form prior to the public hearing on whether <br />construction of five units during rehabilitation was above and beyond existing units, or the units <br />most recently torn down. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said she would vote for the amendment but would not vote for any expansion beyond <br />the pre-2004 boundary. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy called for a vote on the amendment. <br /> <br />The vote on the amendment passed 5:4, Councilors Bettman, Taylor, Ze- <br />lenka, and Ortiz and Mayor Piercy voting in favor; Councilors Clark, <br />Poling, Pryor and Solomon voting in opposition. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz left at 1:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Bettman, Mr. Weinman said the City did not monitor MUPTE <br />documentation after the fact. She asked that the information be provided prior to the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />The amended motion passed 6:1, with Councilors Pryor, Clark, Poling, <br />Taylor, Bettman, and Zelenka voting in favor, and Councilor Solomon <br />voting in opposition. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />C. WORK SESSION: FIREWORKS REGULATIONS <br /> <br />Deputy Chief Joe Zaludek, Fire and Prevention Section, provided the staff report. He reviewed the <br />background of the issue, noting no formal action had been taken by the council on previous correspondence <br />from Fire and EMS staff. The deadline for submitting retail sales permit applications to the State Fire <br />Marshal’s Office for the current retail period scheduled run from June 23 through July 7, 2008, was April <br />15. Permitted retailers were currently well into their purchases for fireworks inventory and other <br />preparations for this season. The Eugene 2008 Olympic Track and Field Trials were scheduled for June 27 <br />through July 6. There was a staffing conflict due to the extraordinary requirements for all area public <br />safety agencies for the trials, which meant there were not sufficient Fire or Police resources available to <br />sustain a concerted enforcement program for the 2008 Fourth of July fireworks season. Additionally, the <br />River Road patchwork of jurisdictions would create an enforcement and political challenge with neighbors <br />being subject to conflicting regulations for the same activity, and currently there was no interest in <br />fireworks ordinance changes on the part of Springfield. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council May 27, 2008 Page 10 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.