Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT D <br />on this testimony, the Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 to modify the amendments to provide an <br />allowance for the temporary keeping of one additional dog for up to six months in any 12-month <br />period. This would allow a dog owner within the city limits to keep three dogs permanently, plus keep <br />one additional dog on a temporary basis for up to six months. <br /> <br /> <br />9.Provide the original amendment on parking proposed by the West University <br />neighborhood. Clarify the Infill Compatibility Standards Task Team’s position on this <br />amendment. <br /> <br />West University Proposal: The West University Neighbors’ original proposal on multi-family parking <br />requirements included two components. The first linked the parking requirements to areas adjacent to <br />the City’s Residential Parking Program zone, and the second based the minimum number of required <br />parking spaces on number of bedrooms in each dwelling unit. <br /> <br />As originally proposed by West University, for dwelling units with two bedrooms or less per unit, the <br />minimum number of required off-street parking spaces is one per dwelling unit, and for dwelling units <br />with three or more bedrooms per unit, the minimum number of required off-street parking spaces is <br />two per dwelling unit. <br /> <br />The amendment was broadened in scope by City Council to address concerns of excessive demand for <br />on-street parking by multi-family development in R-3 and R-4 zones with a substantial number of <br />dwelling units that have three or more bedrooms <br /> <br />Infill Compatibility Standards Task Team: The Infill Compatibility Standards (ICS) Task Team <br />submitted a report to the Planning Commission providing recommendations on a number of the <br />proposed amendments. For the amendment on multi-family parking requirements, the ICS Task Team <br />judged that the West University’s suggestion “better addressed the specific problem in Residential <br />Parking Program (RPP) zones [as compared to the project team’s recommendation] without <br />introducing a potentially contentious city-wide change.” The ICS Task Team’s report was based on <br />the original project team recommendation on the topic of multi-family parking, which was prepared <br />prior to City Council’s action to broaden the amendment topic. <br /> <br />In the revised recommendation on this topic, prepared in response to City Council’s action to broaden <br />the scope of the amendment, the project team recommended the Planning Commission not create a link <br />between the multi-family parking requirements and the Residential Parking Program (RPP), as the RPP <br />program is not a part of Chapter 9 and is administered and enforced by the City’s Parking Services <br />program, with permits issued by Diamond Parking Services. Given this disconnect from the land use <br />code, the project team believed it would be difficult to administer and enforce. Furthermore, not all <br />properties within the concerned areas are within RPP zones. The project team suggested an alternative <br />that based minimum number of required parking spaces on the number of bedrooms, and provided <br />options for applying it in all R-3 and R-4 zones or for specific areas within the city. The Planning <br />Commission decided to pursue a modified option that would require a minimum of one parking space <br />for the first bedroom and an additional .5 parking spaces per each additional bedroom, and made the <br />amendment specific to multi-family developments in the West University and South University <br />neighborhoods. The ICS Task Team did not provide comments on this modified option. <br /> <br />Please contact me at 682-5508 or via e-mail (alissa.h.hansen@ci.eugene.or.us) if you have questions or <br />need additional information. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />