My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: GO Bond for Street Preservation
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 07/16/08 Work Session
>
Item A: GO Bond for Street Preservation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:01:49 PM
Creation date
7/11/2008 1:14:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/16/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Work Session: General Obligation Bonds for Street Preservation Projects <br /> <br />Meeting Date: July 16, 2008 Agenda Item Number: A <br />Department: Central Services Staff Contact: Sue Cutsogeorge <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 682-5589 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br />This work session is a continuation of the discussion about funding for pavement capital preservation <br />projects with a General Obligation (GO) bond measure. The council is asked to provide direction for <br />development of a resolution to place a GO bond measure on the ballot in November 2008. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />Council Action History <br />Over the past several years, the council has worked on ways to adequately fund a large and growing <br />pavement preservation project backlog. Some highlights from the history of this effort are included in <br />Attachment A. <br /> <br />Most recently, on June 9, the council continued discussions about using General Obligation bonds for <br />street preservation projects. At that meeting, the council directed the City Manager to bring back a <br />resolution placing an $81.1 million GO bond measure on the November 2008 ballot, consistent with the <br />initial project list and the draft resolution provided at that meeting. There remained, however, <br />significant questions about how to provide assurance to voters as to which specific street repair projects <br />would be accomplished as a result of approval of the bonds, what the appropriate timing of the bond <br />measure should be, and how citizens will be informed about the need for the bond measure. <br /> <br />On June 23, the council discussed street assessment policies. At that meeting, several councilors <br />requested information about including an element in this bond measure to fund the City’s share of <br />assessment project costs. <br /> <br />As reported previously, the City Manager has convened a Street Maintenance Task Force. The list of <br />members on this task force is included as Attachment B. The task force has met three times and is <br />scheduled to meet three more times. As part of this effort, an updated community survey will be con- <br />ducted during early July. The results will be provided to the council later this month. The group has <br />focused on trying to reach consensus among the broad range of interests represented on the task force <br />for a recommended package of solutions that would provide approximately $15 million of additional <br />funding per year for street repairs in Eugene. At this time, the package under discussion includes the <br />GO bond measure, reallocation of General Fund resources, a county-wide vehicle registration fee and <br />some form of a monthly charge that would be collected through the City’s utility billings. <br /> <br />Project List <br />There are two main policy choices before the council around a bond measure project list: (1) <br />determining a method for providing assurance to voters as to which specific street repair projects will be <br />Z:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080716\S080716A.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.