Ordinance No. 20319 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Should inconsistencies occur, the Metro Plan is the prevailing policy document. The process for reviewing and adopting refinement plans is outlined in Chapter IV. The diagram below indicates the relationship of the Metro Plan to refinement plans and policies. Relationshil) to Lane County Rural Comprehensive Plan The Plan Boundary shown on the Metro Plan Diag,:am in Chapter II is beumtaries of the Mctropolita~ Area General Pla~ are adjacent to the boundaries of the Lane County Rural Comprehensive Plan that surround the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. There is no overlap between the boundaries of the Metro Plan and t4mt-olgthe Lane County Rural Comprehensive Plan. Lane Code Chapter 16 is applied in the area between the UGB m~d the Pla:t~ Boundary to implement the Metro Plan. Adjustments to boundaries may occur in the future so that areas previously a part of one plan are covered under another plan. These adjustments may occur using the Metro Plan review and amendment procedures described in Chapter IV. Relationship to Statewide Plannin~ Goals As required by state law, the Metro Plan has been developed in accordance with the statewide planning goals adopted by the Oregon Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC). m~d published in April 1977, as m'nended through June 1997. These goals provide the standards and set the lkamework for the planning programs of all governmental agencies and bodies in the metropolitan area. The Metro Plan addresses each of the LCDC goals (as well as local goals) and contains objectives and policies that aimed at compliancecompl¥ with the LCDC goals. Relationship to the Technical Supplement and~ Workin~ Papers,-aud-P-ub ' 'lic-~eilitie~-Ptaa The Metro Plan is_,~as based on a work programs approved by the Metropolitan P-lea~ Policy Committee (MPC) and by the governing bodies of Eugene, Springfield, and Lane County after review and hearings by the respective planning commissions (and MAPAC for the 1982 3/letro Plan). _Based on these is-work programs, a~ inventoriesy, reviews, and analyseis of a number of Metro Plan relevant elements arqwer-e conducted. These included population projections, land use and housing (supply and demand), public facilities and se~wices,util/fies, and natural assets and constraints. From this iaventory, review, and mmt-ysi-s,-A sct of working papers3 was ere developed for the 1982 Metro Plan that ,~hiah-describes the relevant issues and factors concerning each subject, and from these analyses, findings were drawn. These findings, in turn, formed an important ~ The working papers are on file for public use in the Springfield, Lane County, and Eugene planning offices, and at the Lm~e C, otmc=i, o~ r-3o~e4~e, ms LCOG. 1-6