My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20319
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2004 No. 20307-20332
>
Ordinance No. 20319
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:45:18 PM
Creation date
2/14/2005 12:07:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
4/27/2004
Document_Number
20319
CMO_Effective_Date
5/27/2004
Author
James D. Torrey
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter II <br /> Fundamental Principles and <br /> Growth Management Policy Framework <br /> <br />This chapter contains Fundamental Principles that reflect the overall themes of the Metro Plan. <br />The chapter also contains: Metropolitma Goals; Growth Management Goals, Findings, and <br />Policies; Eugene and Springfield Jurisdictional Responsibility; Urban and Urbanizable Land; <br />River Road and Santa Clara Goals, Findings and Policies; and Metro Plan Diagram. <br /> <br />A. Fundamental Principles <br /> <br />There are seven principles themes that are basic or fundamental to the entire Metro Plan. They <br />are implicitly included in the various individual Metro Plan components. These Fundamental <br />Principles are: <br /> <br />1. The Metro Plan is a long-range policy document providing the framework within which <br /> more detailed refinement plans are prepared. This concept is discussed in more detail in <br /> Section E of the Introduction (Chapter I). <br /> <br />2. To be meaningful, the Metro Plan requires cooperation by all general purpose, special <br /> district, and special function agencies in the community. This reflects its comprehensive <br /> nature encompassing physical land use, social, and economic implications for the <br /> metropolitan area. Examples where cooperation is essential include planning and <br /> implementation of a transportation system, development of a metropolitan-wide energy <br /> plan, metropolitan-wide analysis and resolution of certain housing issues, and planning <br /> for areas outside the urban growth boundary (UGB) and within the Plan Boundary. <br /> <br />3. The Metro Plan and most of its elements are oriented to and require that urban <br /> development occur in a compact configuration within the metropolitan UGBa prescribed <br /> urban service area. Elaboration of this principle is treated in the other sSections B, C, D <br /> · ',a:d E of this chapter, and in__the Public Facilities and Services Eelement in Chapter III. <br /> <br />4. Comprehensive plans identify and establish the plan-zoning consistency concept and <br /> recognize the importance of timing concerning implementation techniques. <br /> Implementation techniques, including zoning, shall generally be consistent with the <br /> precepts established in the Metro Plan, which is the broad policy document for the <br /> metropolitan area. The consistency test shall continuously be applied to implementation <br /> measures and public actions taken to rectify inconsistencies when the general direction <br /> provided by the Metro Plan is modified. A variety of potential solutions to consistency <br /> problems exist, including modification to the Metro Plan or alteration to the <br /> implementation techniques themselves. <br /> <br />5. The zoning process shall be monitored and adjusted to meet current urban land use <br /> demands through the planning period for all land use categories. <br /> <br /> II-A-1 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.