Laserfiche WebLink
3. Adopted neighborhood refinement and community plans._ (examples in Chapter I of the <br /> <br />4. Adopted special purpose and functional plans. (examples in Chapter I of the Plan). <br /> <br />5. Information generated through preparation of working papers (1978 and 1981) used in <br /> the update process. Those papers are on file in the planning departments of Eugene, <br /> Springfield, and Lane County, as well as the Lane Council of Governments (LCOG). <br /> Their most significant provisions are contained in the Technical Supplement of the Metro <br /> Plan, printed and available under separate cover. Subjects examined include public <br /> services and facilities; environmental assets and constraints, including agricultural land, <br /> the economy, housing, and residential land use, and energy, all in terms of existing <br /> conditions and projected demand. <br /> <br />Land Use Designations <br /> <br />Land use designations shown i_on the Metro Plan Diagram are depicted at a metropolitan scale. <br />Used with the text and local plans and policies, they provide direction for decisions pertaining to <br />appropriate reuse (redevelopment), urbanization of vacant parcels, and additional use of <br />underdeveloped parcels. Since its initial adoption in 1982, the Metro Plan Diagrmu desi,enations <br />have been transitioning to a parcel-specific diagram. As part of this transition, the boundaries of <br />Plan designation areas in the metropolitan UGB are determined on a case-by-case basis, where <br />no parcel-specific designation has been adopted. They are not intended to invalidate local zoning <br />or land uses which are not sufficiently intensive or large enough to be included on the Metro <br />Plan Diagram. They are based on local plans and policies. <br /> <br />Because of their special nature or limited extent, cCertain land uses are not individually of <br />metropolitan-wide significance in terms of size or location because of their special nature or <br />limited extent. Therefore, it is not advisable to account for most of them on the Metro Plan <br />Diagram. The Diagram's depiction of land use designations is not intended to invalidate local <br />zonin~ or land uses which are not sufficiently intensive or large enou,mh to be included on the <br />Metro Plm~ Diagram. <br /> <br />The Plan designation of parcels in the Metro Plan Diagram is parcel-specific in the following <br />cases: <br /> <br /> 1. Parcels shown on the Metro Plan Diagram within a clearly identified Plan <br /> designation, i.e., parcels that do not border more than one Plan desi~mation; <br /> 2. Lands outside the UGB within the Metro Plan boundary; <br /> 3. Parcels with parcel-specific designations adopted through the citizen-initiated <br /> Plan amendment process; <br /> 4. Parcels shown on a parcel-specific refinement plan map that has been adopted as <br /> an amendment to the Metro Plan Diagram. <br /> <br />There is a need for continued evaluation and evolution to a parcel-specific dia~am. The Metro <br />Plan designation descriptions below, Metro Plan policies, adopted buildable lands inventory <br /> <br /> II-G-2 <br /> <br /> <br />