Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Whiteaker neighborhoods. Parks exclusions are used as an effective tool to temporarily forbid certain <br />offenders from remaining in, or returning to City parks. When the downtown core was a pedestrian <br />mall, the City’s downtown mall exclusion ordinance allowed officers to prohibit repeat offenders from <br />returning to the downtown mall for brief periods of time. Officers considered the ordinance to be an <br />effective method for reducing crime. <br /> <br />Exclusion zones create an increased sense of safety for community members who live and work in the <br />designated zone. For example, parks exclusions provide officers with an alternative to incarceration that <br />displaces chronic violators, creating a greater sense of safety in our parks and playgrounds. The civil <br />penalty of exclusion is designed to hold offenders accountable for their actions, to remove offenders <br />from unhealthy environments and to break the cycle of criminal and offensive behavior. The absence of <br />repeat offenders from the designated zone can improve commerce and encourage a more welcoming <br />environment for visitors and residents of the area. On the other hand, the use of exclusion zones does <br />curtail the freedom of an excluded person to move about within the exclusion zone. <br /> <br />This proposed exclusion ordinance, like the prostitution and the downtown mall exclusion ordinances, <br />allows excluded persons to apply for variances to enter the zone for certain specific purposes (for <br />example, to access social services within the zone). Both the prostitution and the downtown mall <br />exclusion ordinances were applied in some measure to members of vulnerable populations who accessed <br />social services located within the exclusion zones. Allowing subjects excluded by ordinance into the <br />zone for important services was occasionally challenging. The City received complaints that exclusions <br />were not consistently applied, leading to some perception of disparate enforcement. <br /> <br />The proposed ordinance requires a municipal court judge to find by a preponderance of evidence that the <br />person committed a certain crime within the zone before the exclusion becomes effective. The 90-day <br />exclusion triggered by arrest or citation will terminate if the excluded person is acquitted, if the charges <br />are dismissed, or if no charges are filed. An alternative version of the ordinance was prepared for <br />discussion at the June 9 City Council work session. This alternative provided for exclusion only upon <br />conviction of certain offenses within the Downtown Public Safety Zone. The council could choose to <br />adopt an amended ordinance that provides for an immediate exclusion triggered by arrest or citation for <br />more serious offenses (such as person crimes or felonies) and exclusion upon conviction for less serious <br />offenses. <br /> <br />. <br />The critical component of an effective exclusion zone is a consistent police presence To be effective, <br />the same police officers, familiar with chronic offenders, need to be assigned persistently to the same <br />area. Individuals excluded from the zone are more likely to honor the restrictions imposed on them <br />when they believe consequences are reliable and predictable. <br /> <br />Municipal Court Impacts <br />During the June 9, 2008 work session, Judge Allen commented on the expected increase in case filings <br />the Eugene Municipal Court as a result of the proposed ordinance. He indicated that the court would be <br />responsible for timely processing of all exclusion and variance matters in addition to regular court <br />proceedings; resulting in increases to both judicial and court staff time. The additional prosecutions for <br />violation of exclusion orders will also increase City Prosecutor and court appointed attorney hours. <br /> <br />The ability to impose meaningful sanctions is critical in addressing the target problem. For many <br />individuals alternative sanctions such as road crew or community service are not a viable option. <br /> Z:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M080721\S0807213.doc <br /> <br />